Tea Party Patriots Ordinary citizens reclaiming America's founding principles.
Showing posts with label WEF. Show all posts
Showing posts with label WEF. Show all posts

Saturday, August 27, 2022

Stop the vaccinations

 


I find it difficult to share the column by Emerald Robinson; she’s reporting on research conducted “by a group of German scientists who call themselves The Working Group For COVID Vaccine Analysis.”  Some of my family and friends have gotten the COVID jab(s), and it’s a sorry comment that I hope that the only side-effect that any of them – indeed ANYONE who’s been jabbed -- will experience is the possibility of being biometrically surveilled sometime in the future. Here’s the beginning of Ms. Robinson’s column:

One of the most important reports in the world has been released by a group of German scientists who call themselves The Working Group For COVID Vaccine Analysis. The members of the group have chosen to remain anonymous at the moment because vaccine critics “have been publicly defamed, ostracized, and economically ruined.” That’s a wise decision — considering the contents of this report. This working group has made several preliminary discoveries that will reverberate around the world.

The conclusion of this group’s report is simple and stark: all COVID vaccine programs must be halted immediately.

Why? Because every COVID vaccine that was tested was toxic to human beings.

To make matters worse: the blood of vaccinated individuals has been corrupted in terrible ways, including deformed red blood cells, blood clots, elevated blood viscosity, and the presence of “novel structures” made of strange materials that “cannot be explained as contamination from the manufacturing process.”

Let me repeat: all COVID vaccines that were tested contained “substances the purpose of which cannot be determined.”

. . .

The inescapable conclusion from this report will send shockwaves throughout the world: the COVID vaccines are toxic to humans and they were designed to be toxic.

Dangerous substances and toxic metals that were never disclosed by Pfizer or Moderna or AstraZeneca or Johnson & Johnson are found consistently in blood samples and, therefore, cannot be “accidental contaminants” but rather ingredients that were secretly and deliberately included in the vaccines.

I want to highlight four of the group’s discoveries:

The first discovery: toxic substances were found in all of the samples of COVID-19 vaccines — without exception.

The second discovery: The blood samples of all the people who had been vaccinated showed marked changes.

The third discovery: The greater the stability of the envelope of lipid nanoparticles, the more frequent are vaccine side effects.

The fourth discovery: The vaccines consistently contain substances the purpose of which cannot be determined. Using a small sample of live blood analyses from both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, artificial intelligence (AI) can distinguish with 100% reliability between the blood of the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. This indicates that the COVID-19 vaccines can effect long-term changes in the composition of the blood of the person vaccinated without that person being aware of these changes.

. . .

Let me finish this post with some thoughts on the fourth discovery: the vaccines consistently contain substances the purpose of which cannot be determined. What are these “metallic” substances and “novel structures” meant to do? The key is to remember that the COVID “vaccines” are actually part of a new system of global biometric surveillance.

The intellectual guru of the New World Order, professor Yuval Noah Harari, has explained this new system [published in 2020] in detail.

Ms. Robinson further elaborates on the four discoveries. You may need a few days to gradually work through her report;  it’s not that it is long – it’s that it is sickening and frightening.  Here’s the link.

Another report based on the same German study is by Mac Slavo at AmericaFirst Report.  If the German study is correct, and if Ms. Robinson and Mr. Slavo have accurately described it (and do follow their embedded links), then the New World Order is here.   

# # #


Tuesday, July 19, 2022

New World Order or Old World Order?

 


Just when you thought the New World Order was inevitable, and it was the end of life in America as we know it, along comes Daniel Greenfield at FrontPageMag with some skeptical words of reassurance:

. . . The new world we live in now is one where Russia is trying to rebuild a Czarist empire, and China, Iran, and every other power or power that was, is fighting to recreate its glory days.

The patchwork international order had been a product of the Cold War that Bush and Gorbachev were eagerly bidding farewell to. Globalism, or the post-Cold War international order based on trade, human rights and conferences proved to be as much of a joke as the UN, the WTO, the NGOs and the multilateral organizations that served as its shaky infrastructure.

Bush envisioned "a world where the rule of law supplants the rule of the jungle" and "nations recognize the shared responsibility for freedom and justice" on the brink of the original Gulf War.

But the only law that ever existed was the law of force enforced by self-interest or idealism.

. . .

The old world order is the reality that once the meetings are done and the conferences are over, every country is all alone. Virtue signaling globalism means that everyone will fly Ukrainian flags, just as they expressed solidarity with Hong Kong and will hashtag Taiwan at need.

And then they’ll move on to the next political outrage, celebrity gossip or trending news.

. . .

A century of tired arguments have reduced us to the false choice between isolationism and internationalism. But at the height of our rising power in the 19th century, the United States was neither. It was not afraid of asserting its ideals, but neither was it foolish enough to believe that the rest of the world would go along or that we were obligated to make them all behave. We primarily pursued our own interests and we were not afraid of a little expansionism either. 

Most importantly, we did not see our place in the world as bound by the rest of the world.

 . . .

The American Revolution and the Constitution ushered in the true new world order not by seeking to control the world, but by showing the human race what was possible. Every effort to outdo that order with a new world order has failed.  . . .

Mr. Greenfield’s full article is here.  I would like to think he’s right.  

# # #


Thursday, June 9, 2022

Globalists in our midst

 


Having been thrown off of Twitter, YouTube, etc., for daring to question the COVID vaccine mandates, Dr Robert Malone now publishes his columns on Substack.  His column yesterday provides a list of elected and non-elected officials, past and present, who have been described as World Economic Forum (WEF) graduates, in other words, indoctrinated globalists.  Below is a partial list (click here for the full list) of "graduates", and if you have family or friends in any of the states where some of these New World Order types may be challenged, please forward accordingly.

These WEF graduates have their primary alliances with a foreign entity, that being the WEF. They should register as foreign agents in my opinion.  . . . 

Huma Abedin US Department of State Deputy chief of staff and aide to Hillary Clinton (2009– 2013) and vice chair of Hillary's presidential campaign

Penny Abeywardena Mayors office City of New York Mayors office City of New York

Robert E. Andrews United States House of Representatives Congressman from New Jersey (D), 1st District

Matt Blunt State of Missouri Governor of Missouri

Carol M. Browner Office of the President of the United States Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change Policy (2009–2011)

George P. Bush Texas General Land Office Land Commissioner (2015–)

Pete Buttigieg Government of the United States  Secretary of Transportation (2021–)

Jim Cooper U.S. House of Representatives Democrat Congressman Tennessee 32 yrs

Tom Cotton U.S. Senate Senator from Arkansas (R)

Daniel Crenshaw United States Congress Rep. from Texas, 2nd District (2019–)

Artur Davis US Congress Congressman from Alabama, 7th District (D)

Brian Deese National Economic Council National Economic Council

Mike Espy Government of the US Secretary of Agriculture (1993–1994)

Steven Fulop Jersey City, N.J. Mayor of Jersey City (2013–)

Tulsi Gabbard United States House of Representatives Congresswoman from Hawaii (D), 2nd District

Garlin II Gilchrist State of Michigan Lieutenant Governor

Nikki Haley US Government  US Ambassador to the UN

Jaime Herrera Beutler US House of Representatives Congresswoman from Washington (R), 3rd District

Benjamin Jealous NAACP -

Bobby Jindal State of Louisiana Governor of Louisiana

Joseph P. Kennedy III US House of Representatives Rep for the suburbs of Boston, Massachusetts

Adam Kinzinger Illinois American Politician

Gavin Newsom State of California Governor of California (2019–)

Jared Polis State of Colorado, USA Governor of Colorado (2019–)

Samantha Power National Security Council (NSC) Past US Ambassador to UN

Richard L. Scott Columbia/HCA US Governor/Senator - Florida

Elise Stefanik US House of Representatives Congresswoman from New York, 21st District (R)

Click here for the rest of it.

# # #


Wednesday, June 1, 2022

Defining terms: “Stakeholder capitalism”

 


The Editorial Board at Issues & Insights weighed in on the recently concluded World Economic Forum in Davos.  The title of the editorial, “The Devils of Davos,” is not hyperbole.  Here’s Klaus Schwab’s shameless statement and a blogger response: 

  • “When it comes to business and economic activities, Davos is not a place for narrow self-interest,” WEF chairman and founder Klaus Schwab said. “It is instead a place for the implementation of the notion of stakeholder capitalism, a concept I’m fighting for since 50 years.”

“‘Stakeholder capitalism’ is an oxymoron, and it is a synonym for fascism,” writes ‘Streetwise Professor’. 

“‘Stakeholder capitalism’ has no limiting principle. It can be used to claim control over anything anywhere anytime … It is a synonym for fascism because it is a variant on corporatism, which is the essence of the fascist economic model.”

More interesting quotes and comments at Issues & Insights are here. And “Streetwise Professor” further elaborates:

'Stakeholder capitalism’ is an oxymoron, because capitalism means that the owners of capital make the decisions on how it is used. Marxists have never liked the way that capitalists used it, which is why they wanted to expropriate it. At least they were honest, and didn’t say they were advocating “socialized capitalism.” “Stakeholder capitalism” means that those who don’t own something can nonetheless dictate how to use it, because they have some self-asserted “stake” in it. Using the word “capitalism” is a clever trick to seduce non-Marxists into believing that what Schwab et al are advocating is just a kinder, gentler version of a free market economy, when in fact their agenda is profoundly anti-capitalism and anti-freedom.

# # #


Saturday, May 14, 2022

Ceding America's sovereignty: serious developments


It’s worse than I thought.  Yesterday, I read about the upcoming World Health Organization (WHO) conference starting on May 22 in Switzerland. Two Mikes at Freedom First Network were reporting that the White House occupant, Joe Biden, would be surrendering all American sovereignty to the World Health Organization and the UN at that conference:

There they will, with . . . other nations, sign away the sovereignty of the United States on a WHO Treaty that will allow the WHO, when it declares a medical emergency, to take over all control of all health-related operations in the United States and give orders to the U.S. governments about how they will handle the American people.

It’s one of those reports that makes you start looking for corroborating reports – while hoping this news can’t be true. 

Today, I found two more reports that provide that corroboration.  One is Neil Oliver at Conservative Treehouse:

It is worth remembering that President Donald Trump insisted on divorce from the WHO – on the grounds that it was too close to China, only for President Biden to remarry them again in 2021. All of that is history, however. In a matter of days, the World Health Assembly will meet in Geneva for a vote on the treaty. The target date for final ratification is in May 2024, but by then the power grab will have long been completed.

Amendments written into the proposed treaty by the re-enamored Biden administration will see 194 nations cede sovereignty over national health care decisions to the WHO. The WHO would thereby have decision-making power over and above our own government – and every other government.

Read the rest here.  In addition, JD Rucker expands on the context at NOQ, and his analysis alludes to the collaboration between the WHO and the World Economic Forum (WEF):

When news broke yesterday that the globalists at the World Economic Forum expected Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to attend their annual Davos conference, most conservative news outlets pounced on the notion that he’s going to be wasting his time with his buddy, Klaus Schwab, instead of focusing on bringing peace to his nation and protecting his people.

This is a valid argument, though one that has been made every time Zelensky appears to be doing something other than focusing on the war efforts. What seems to have gotten lost in all of this is that Zelensky is almost certainly going to be positioned as not just a victim, but also a potential leader to spearhead the stated purposes of this year’s meeting: Advancing the world toward The Great Reset, ending capitalism, and subverting Western domination over the world.

Read the rest of Mr. Rucker’s analysis here.

Yes, it sounds like tin hat stuff, but the sources I’ve linked to are not crazy conspiracy theorist types.  Neil Oliver, Sundance at Treehouse, and J D Rucker do lots of research and apply critical thinking before posting or taping.  Speaking for myself, I’ve had to re-read all these reports before posting. 

# # #


Saturday, March 26, 2022

“Uncovering the Corona Narrative”: the digital-financial complex



Dr Robert Malone is the scientist who is credited with inventing the mRNA technology, i.e., the delivery system for the COVID “vaccines” by Pfizer, Moderna, et al.  He is hardly an anti-vaxxer, and this blog has linked to his speeches and articles before.  Because he is on record as skeptical of the “vaccines”, especially for children, he’s been censored, kicked off YouTube and Twitter, etc., but his latest posting on Substack introduces the transcript of a talk in August 2021 by Ernst Wolff:

Many who have followed this coronavirus “public health crisis” and the non-sensical response provided by most of the western nations (including the USA) have been perplexed by two big questions - how was this done (in such a globally coordinated fashion), and why was it done?

In my case, I have tried to follow the various threads of facts and logic, to confront the perplexingly dysfunctional public policies, and to make sense of what is so deeply illogical. What I have found has been layers of lies, one on top of another, which seem to require an amazingly coordinated and globally comprehensive control and shaping of information in the form of propaganda and censorship on a scale which was previously unimaginable. Total information control, and total unrestricted, all encompassing information warfare. Modern media manipulation of thought and minds without boundaries, and without any ethical constraints.

One constant thread which runs through all of the mismanagement, all of the authoritarian policies, all of the totalitarian logic and messaging, has been the role of the World Economic Forum (WEF) and its acolytes. WEF is a key think tank and meeting place for global capitalism management, and arguably qualifies as the leading global Deep State organization. Under the leadership of Professor Klaus Schwab, it has played an increasingly important role in coordinating the globalized hegemony of transnational capital and large corporations over Western democracies during the last three decades. Many of its members actively use Covid-19 as cover to carry out a “Great Reset” as described in Schwab’s writings. This Great Reset involves implementation of digital tracking and control of people, ushering in techno-feudalism, and the WEF objective of a fourth industrial revolution incorporating technologies collectively referred to as “transhumanism.” Western governments and WEF have identified genetic mRNA vaccines as a first step toward an inevitable transhuman society which they seek to guide us towards. The WEF has developed and implemented a training program which has yielded thousands of acolytes who have been placed into positions of power throughout the western world. A small representative sampling of these includes the following drawn from the ranks of the United States government and industry:

And he goes on to enumerate the scope of the power-grab in

  • Politics and policy
  • Legacy media
  • Technology and social media

Dr Malone then segues to Ernst Wolffs' answer to the big questions that have plagued all of us. And Mr Wolff asks the million dollar question about COVID and the “vaccines”:

Can it really be the case, that everything that we’ve experienced was planned?

The rest of the transcript is concerned with Wollf’s interpretation of the facts and policies that he reviewed over many months; he does a convincing job of connecting the dots.  Read the rest here.

I had to read through this analysis in installments;  it’s a lot to absorb.  So I’m leaving this one on the blog over the weekend.  Spoiler: this analysis ends on a very hopeful note. 

# # #