Just some politically incorrect humor from youngcons.com:
# # #
Sunday, April 19, 2015
Wednesday, April 15, 2015
Monday, April 13, 2015
House Bill 34 - Taking A Stand For Ohioans’ Healthcare
The blog below appeared at the Health Care Compact blog and at the Ohio Representatives' website here:
THE OHIO HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES: House Bill 34 - Taking A Stand For Ohioans’ Healthcare
POSTED BY HEALTH CARE COMPACT
By: Ohio State Representative Ron Maag
As in all General Assemblies, protecting the healthcare of Ohioans is a very important issue to those of us in the state legislature. That is why I decided to co-sponsor a bill, introduced by my colleagues Representative Wes Retherford (R-Hamilton) and Representative Terry Boose (R-Norwalk), that I see as crucial to protecting the healthcare coverage of my constituents and citizens around the state.
House Bill 34 seeks to ratify the Health Care Compact, which allows Ohio to suspend the operation of all federal laws, rules, regulations, and orders regarding healthcare that are inconsistent with Ohio laws adopted pursuant to the Compact. I believe that this issue is better served at the state level, by Ohioans who know what we as a state need in terms of coverage.
Restoring the power to regulate healthcare to the states is crucial. House Bill 34 would require that Ohio secures Congress’s consent to regulate its own healthcare standards, freeing us from unnecessary federal regulations and mandates.
The bill would also require our governor to appoint a member to the Interstate Advisory Health Care Commission, which would collect and evaluate information that is needed for these member states to regulate their own healthcare system. Input from all members and states on this commission will be valuable in making determinations for the future.
By placing a firm focus on how to best serve our residents, I believe we can take a step in the right direction in terms of offering Ohioans exceptional healthcare options while removing hindrances from the federal government. I want our citizens to have access to affordable, reliable care that does not encourage a dependence on government services. I will continue to support regulations made by Ohioans for Ohioans.
Please feel free to contact my office regarding this legislation or any other state government related issue. My door is always open as I continue to serve as your state representative. You can contact me at (614) 644-6023 or Rep62@ohiohouse.gov.
# # #
Do you know where your Representative stands?
Sunday, April 5, 2015
Thursday, March 26, 2015
Photo ID law in Wisconsin is upheld
Earlier
this week, Cleveland Tea Party Patriots learned about the initiatives to require
Photo IDs in order to vote. Chris Long addressed the issue as it concerns voter
fraud as opposed to voter integrity. Ohio voters can take a look at a recent development
on a voter ID law in Wisconsin, via Hot Air:
Surprise: SCOTUS upholds Wisconsin voter-ID law
POSTED AT 12:01 PM ON
MARCH 23, 2015 BY ED MORRISSEY
Or maybe not such a surprise after
all. The path to today’s Supreme Court decision to refuse an appeal by the ACLU
against Wisconsin’s voter-ID law has been strewn with appellate decisions that supported its implementation,
although a last-minute stay by SCOTUS kept it out of play for the midterms.
The law will fully take effect for the 2016 election, which may complicate
efforts by Democrats to keep the state blue:
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday left intact a new
Republican-backed law in Wisconsin that requires voters to present photo
identification when they cast ballots.
The court declined to hear an appeal filed by the American Civil
Liberties Union, which challenged the law. …
A federal judge blocked the state’s voter ID law in March 2012
soon after it took effect and entered a permanent injunction in April, finding
the measure would deter or prevent a substantial number of voters who lack
photo identification from casting ballots, and place an unnecessary burden on
the poor and minorities.
The 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals blocked the decision and
subsequently ruled in October that the law was constitutional. Wisconsin’s
Supreme Court upheld the voter ID law in a separate ruling.
The SCOTUS stay in October had more to do with the timing of the
law, thanks to the scheduling of the challenges through the courts. Regardless,
the election still went in favor of Scott Walker and the GOP, preventing
Democrats from repealing the voter-ID provision before it could come into
effect.
This will put a
huge dent in the Obama administration’s efforts to squelch voter-ID laws in
other states. In order to grant certiorari, the ACLU would have needed four justices
to vote to add it to the docket. The fact that they couldn’t even move the
liberal wing to unite against a voter-ID law shows that the justices consider
the issue settled. Requirements for identification at polling stations are
legitimate, in the eyes of the court, as long as enough options for no-cost
qualifying ID exist to keep the poor from being disenfranchised.
The dismissal of this challenge to the law will also help boost
Walker’s efforts outside of Wisconsin. He’s known for reforming the
public-employee unions, balancing the budget, and most recently for signing
Right to Work legislation even if he advised the Republican-controlled
legislature to move more slowly on the latter. Some forget that Walker backed
the voter-ID legislation as part of his reform package that got him elected in
2010, and then reconfirmed in 2012 and re-elected again in 2014. It gives
Walker an argument to position himself as the reformer who has a real track
record of conservative change in a purple state, change that could turn the
state red for good.
However, the
Supreme Court decision isn’t keeping the ACLU fromdemanding yet another delay, on the same basis as the last
one:
The Wisconsin state elections board says it is awaiting direction
from the state Department of Justice about what comes next now that the U.S.
Supreme Court has refused to hear a challenge to the state’s voter
identification law.
The American Civil Liberties Union asked a federal appeals court
to block implementation of the law for the April 7 election.
If the ACLU gets its waiver, it had better enjoy it — because it
will be its last.
Update: It’s more
accurate to say that the refusal to grant cert in this case upholds the law rather than approves it,
although functionally it’s the same thing. I’ve changed the headline from
“approves” to “upholds.”
# # #
Sunday, March 22, 2015
Common Core Komrade's Put Cyber-Snooping on Steroids
With cyber-snooping that would make communist China & agents of the former KGB giddy with glee, Pearson and a slew of Common Core cyber-snooping companies, are monitoring your children's lives - even at home.
Hiding behind the innocuous excuse of "monitoring social media to check for leaks on test questions," some of the snooping programs being used, along with being able to monitor any inappropriate on-line comments, have the ability to identify which students fritter away hours on Facebook and which buckle down to homework right after dinner.
Responding to this big brother cyber-snooping in the name of "education," the American Federation of Teachers have started a petition (Click Here to Read) demanding that the Bill Gates funded Common Core Komrade's at Pearson stop spying on our children.
Bent over their computers in Salt Lake City, a dozen cyber sleuths scan the vast reaches of the Internet for contraband. Only, they’re not hunting traffickers of drugs or sex.It’s standardized testing season across the U.S. — and they’re on the lookout for student tweets about the tests.The web patrol team works for Caveon, a test security company charged with protecting the integrity of new Common Core exams developed by the publishing giant Pearson. To that end, they’re monitoring social media for any leaks about test questions. News of the surveillance broke this week, sparking a firestorm. The American Federation of Teachers even circulated a petition demanding that Pearson “stop spying on our kids.”But Pearson is hardly the only company keeping a watchful eye on students.School districts and colleges across the nation are hiring private companies to monitor students’ online activity, down to individual keystrokes, to scan their emails for objectionable content and to scrutinize their public posts on Twitter, Facebook, Vine, Instagram and other popular sites. The surveillance services will send principals text-message alerts if a student types a suspicious phrase or surfs to a web site that raises red flags.
A dozen states have tried to limit cyber snooping by banning either colleges or K-12 schools, or both, from requesting student user names and passwords, which could be used to pry open social media accounts protected by privacy settings. Among those taking action: California, Illinois, Michigan and Utah.
At least five other states, among them New York and Maryland, are considering similar laws this session, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
But such laws protect only accounts marked as private. Many kids post publicly to build up their online followings.
And when they do, companies with names like Social Sentinel, Geo Listening, Varsity Monitor and UDiligence are there to read them.
The rise of online student monitoring comes at a time of rising parent protests against other forms of digital surveillance — namely, the vast quantities of data that technology companies collect on kids as they click through online textbooks, games and homework. Companies providing those online resources can collect millions of unique data points on a child in a single day. Much of that information is not protected by federal privacy law.
School administrators don’t tend to be too interested in that data, because it’s far too granular for them to make sense of it until an ed-tech company mines it for patterns.
But some principals, coaches and college presidents are acutely interested in student tweets.
Enter the surveillance services, which promise to scan student posts around the clock and flag anything that hints at bullying, violence or depression. The services will also flag any post that could tarnish the reputation of either the student or the educational institution. They’ll even alert administrators to garden-variety teenage hijinks, like a group of kids making plans to skateboard on school property.
Some of the monitoring software on the market can track and log every keystroke a student makes while using a school computer in any location, including at home. Principals can request text alerts if kids type in words like “guns” or “drugs,” or browse websites about anorexia or suicide. They can even order up reports identifying which students fritter away hours on Facebook and which buckle down to homework right after dinner.
Other programs scan all student emails, text messages and documents sent on a school’s online platform and alert school administrators — or law enforcement — to any that sound inappropriate.
The more comprehensive services attempt to break down anonymity offered by sites like Twitter and YouTube, where students don’t have to display their real names. Analysts cross-reference photos, map friend networks and even try to deduce class schedules from the timing of social media posts in order to unmask students who use pseudonyms online.
Sometimes the monitoring is covert: One company advertises that its surveillance software, known as CompuGuardian, can run on “stealth mode.” At the other extreme, some high schools and colleges explicitly warn students that they are being watched and advise them not to cling to “a false sense of security about your rights to freedom of speech.”
During standardized tests, the monitoring kicks up a notch. Several major assessment developers, including ETS, ACT and Smarter Balanced, told POLITICO that they do exactly what Pearson hired Caveon to do: Scan the web for any breaches in security, such as a photo of a test question or a Facebook post describing an essay prompt.
State officials often conduct their own sweeps of the Internet as well during testing season.
But it’s the day-to-day posts that those in the business of student surveillance find most illuminating.
Chris Frydrych, the CEO of Geo Listening, says his service routinely alerts school principals to students whose posts indicate they’re feeling particularly stressed or angry. He also points administrators to students who share too much personal information online, leaving them vulnerable to cyber predators.
Boasts about cheating. Dares to act recklessly. Taunts. Threats. Trash talk about teachers. For $7,500 per school per year, his service will scoop it all up and report it all to administrators.
“Our philosophy is, if someone in China can type in your child’s user name and see what they’re posting publicly on social media, shouldn’t the people who are the trusted in adults in a child’s life see that information?” Frydrych said.
He responds to critics who worry about privacy violations by quoting a student tweet he spotted while monitoring a school: “Twitter is not your diary. Get over it.”
Many education officials are uneasy with such services. “It’s not considered politically correct,” said Barbara-Jane Paris, past president of the National Association of Secondary School Principals. “It upsets students and stakeholders because they feel like they’re being spied on.”
But to some school administrators, cyber surveillance seems a natural extension of the age-old practice of deploying adult monitors to keep kids in line during lunch and recess. (Social Sentinel plays on that sentiment with its slogan: “Don’t leave the digital playground unattended.”)
“All the information is out there,” said David Jones, the president of Safe Outlet Corp., which markets the CompuGuardian software. The key, he said, is helping harried administrators sort through the enormously rich — and astoundingly intimate — digital trails each student unknowingly creates.
Is the principal concerned about kids goofing off in class? He can look at every program every student has installed on school laptops. Or he can track their web searches. Is he worried about bullying? He can snoop on online chats — reading both the student’s side of the conversation and any responses. Principals can even use the surveillance tools to figure out if they’re wasting money on apps no one uses.
“Everyone would just like for this to go away, but it’s not going to,” said Dan Domenech, executive director of AASA | The School Superintendents Association. “All the kids are on some form of social media now. You can’t ignore it.”
In the affluent suburban community of Deerfield, Ill., Superintendent Michael Lubelfeld signed up for a service called Gaggle, which scans student email and attachments, text messages, discussion boards and documents for words or images deemed inappropriate. The company says it discovers millions of inappropriate words and sends thousands of alerts to school administrators each year.
In Deerfield, Gaggle has unearthed just one serious incident in the past the 18 months — an eighth-grader emailing a nude photo of herself, Lubelfeld said. The student was given counseling. Gaggle has also notified Lubelfeld about a handful of less alarming incidents, such as the time a student tried to email a friend a photo of her baby brother with his naked bottom visible.
Lubelfeld also uses separate surveillance system, Hapara, that lets teachers see exactly which web pages kids have open when they’re using the school’s computers. The system, which costs $6 per student per year, also lets teachers take screen shots of a student’s computer or remotely shut down an inappropriate site, such as a video game. That system, too, has turned up few violations.
If nothing else, Lubelfeld said, it tends to keep the students in line: “Once the children realized that the teachers could use Hapara, they’ve pretty much stayed on task,” he said.
Other administrators, however, shy away from surveillance.
Hundreds of students follow the Twitter account of Jason Markey, the principal at East Leyden High School in Franklin Park, Ill. But Markey tells them all he will never follow them. If someone calls his attention to a student tweet that is offensive or frightening or abusive, he’ll absolutely take action, Markey said. Yet he most emphatically does not want to be in the business of cyber stalking his students.
“They need to know there is a separation,” Markey said. “Just because there are [surveillance] tools out there doesn’t mean that I have to look closer at what they’re doing online. I want to give them their space.”
Pearson’s monitoring program, first disclosed by New Jersey blogger Bob Braun, sparked anger from parents and teachers in part because the company has become a symbol of the controversial changes sweeping through public schools, such as the emphasis on high-stakes testing and the shift to the Common Core academic standards.
Irate parents and teachers have peppered social media with attacks on Pearson, many of them using the hashtag #Pearsoniswatching. The American Federation of Teachers has joined in, circulating a petition that features a creepy photo of a man in trench coat, fedora and sunglasses staring out a car window. The first line of the petition: “Big Brother really is watching.”
Pearson’s practice is not at all unusual. Only one testing vendor contacted by POLITICO, the American Institutes for Research, said it does not monitor social media. All others said they routinely scan such sites to look for breaches in test security.
They said they examine only public posts, not posts hidden behind privacy walls. And they said they use public sources, such as a Facebook account linked to a Twitter site, to verify students’ identity. If an inappropriate post is spotted, the companies generally contact state education officials, who reach out to the student’s school district to seek help taking down the post.
In a statement, Pearson adamantly rejected the notion that it is spying on students. “Absolutely not,” the company said.
In response to parent concerns, states using Pearson’s new PARCC exam did ask the company to stop cross-checking the names of students suspected of making inappropriate posts against the company’s list of registered test-takers. And New Jersey officials said Thursday that they would review the monitoring process to make sure student privacy is not compromised.
Yet state officials defended the basic principle of monitoring the web to ensure test questions aren’t leaked.
“The accounts Pearson is looking at are, by definition, public accounts with no expectations of privacy,” said Jacqueline Reis, a spokesperson for the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Tuesday, March 17, 2015
The Destiny of Health Care in Ohio is in Our Hands: Support the Health Care Compact (HB 34)
As we continue our call for a full repeal of Obamacare, it is important that, when doing so, we also continue our fight for healthcare freedom in Ohio with support and passage of the Health Care Compact (HB 34).
Currently, the Health Care Compact (HB 34) is in the Ohio House State Government Committee. To read the text of HB 34, click here. To read the Legislative Services analysis of HB 34, click here.
Please contact the below GOP members of the House State Government Committee and respectfully request that they support the Health Care Compact (HB 34) and put Ohioans in charge of their own health care destiny.
With your support and immediate action, we can move one step closer to achieving our goal of true health care freedom for all Ohio citizens!
State Government Committee
Rep. Ron Maag / Chair
Phone: (614) 644-6023
Contact: http://www.ohiohouse.gov/ron-maag/contact
Rep. Stephanie Kunze / Vice-Chair
Phone: (614) 466-8012
Rep. John Becker
Phone: (614) 466-8134
Rep. Cheryl Grossman
Phone: (614) 466-9690
Rep. Bob Hackett
Phone: (614) 466-1470
Rep. Ron Hood
Phone: (614) 466-1464
Rep. Stephen Huffman
Phone: (614) 466-8114
Rep. Sarah LaTourette
Phone: (614) 644-5088
Rep. Rick Perales
Phone: (614) 644-6020
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
