image credit: istockphoto.com
JD Rucker at NOQ Report has transcribed a big chunk of his interview with Dr. Carrie Madej on the hazards of “monoclonal antibodies”:
Dr. Carrie Madej Issues Shocking Warning About Monoclonal Antibodies
It's been the "silver bullet" that so many have embraced. But what do we really know about monoclonal antibodies? Are they really better than the vaccines or are they just another experiment that's bound to go awry?
. . .
“Even in the freedom movement, the
‘anti-vaxxers,’ people are against getting these injections or genetic
modification devices, really, but then I see those same people run to get the
monoclonal antibodies and I think, ‘Oh, you just have no idea,'” she said.
“First of all, they’re brand new,
they’re experimental, they have very little research on them, okay,” she
continued. “You’re putting something in your body that we don’t have research
on. However, we know something about it.
“So, these are called a cocktail.
So, what that is, they’re taking antibodies from three sources. One is just a
‘human source.’ What does that mean? Is it somebody from the street? I mean,
what is that? Do we know if they’re purified? We don’t know. Okay, that’s one.
“Number two, they’re using aborted
fetal cells. When they say they’re not, they’re lying. They’re using a play on
words. They’re using the HEK line, the human embryotic kidney cell line. It’s 293.
What that means is it took 293 … living babies that were born. So they aborted
them alive. They’re still living with their heart beating. Then they take them
to a cold lab and then they kill them there.
“It took 293 of them to get that
cell line. So what they do is they make those lines cancerous so they never
stop dividing. They don’t want to tell you they’re putting cancer cells from an
aborted fetus in you so they’re going to tell you that it’s ‘immortalized’ —
isn’t that a nice word. Then they tell you they’re cloned. That’s what it
means. You’re taking in an aborted fetus that was killed in a lab and then you
had a cancerous cell line from it that’s being injected inside of you. Okay, so
you’ve got two sources.
“Now, the third one is from a human
and a mouse genome pushed together inside of a mouse, and the mouse spits out a
human kind of an antibody but from a mouse. So this is something called a
chimera. A chimera is two creatures pushed together and they’re going to be
spitting out an antibody.
“Now, you have to understand, all
the genetic material that a human body takes up, whether we eat it, whether we
inhale it, we become injected with it… our bodies are amazing. It takes up
genetic material to analyze it, sometimes incorporate it inside our genome.
It’s called epigenetics.”
Even at this point of the
interview, I was having concerns about the monoclonal antibodies based on the
information I was hearing. But it was during the next portion of Dr. Madej’s
answer that I became truly shocked.
“There’s a problem also with the
human-mouse antibody cell line,” she continued. “It has a trade name called
VelocImmune. So, I knew this, I recognized this from years ago when I had a
very big practice here in Georgia. I took different cases, complicated, and of
course I got cancer patients. Well, many of them were breast cancer patients
that were put on a newer chemotherapy agent immunotherapy.
“And they use this same mouse-human
line. It’s called VelocImmune, okay. So they took that line and they put this
in this chemo-agent. At first, the people looked great. These women were doing
wonderfully. ‘I feel good. My tumor shrank.’
“And then what happened within one
to three years? Sometimes five but usually one to three years there was an
allergic reaction, they called it, and a woman would come back loaded with
cancer. All the organs looked like they had melted together. I couldn’t, nor
could the radiologist, tell one organ from another. So, it was a fulminant,
terrible reaction. This was a failure.
“They’re going to use the same
mouse line on people right now. This is horrifying because, although people are
only getting one or two of these doses, not many, this can’t be good.”
. . .
In addition to the transcribed remarks, Mr. Rucker also
links to the 1-hour video – the full interview plus additional context; click here.
# # #
