Monday, June 22, 2015
It is Time for Ohioans to be in Control of our own Health Care
With the uncertainty of Obamacare in the courts, the outcome of any ruling, even if in our favor, will not completely rid Ohio citizens from the chains of Obamacare & the federal government.
US Senator John Cornyn & US Senator James Lankford explain in this op-ed how through the Health Care Compact, we have an opportunity at a second chance to get health care right in our country.
At the federal level, Congressman Doug Collins of Georgia filed the Health Care Compact in the U.S. House of Representatives. Once Congress passes the legislation, the nine (and counting!) states that have joined the Compact would be able to take back control of health care from the federal government.
Looking to become the 10th member state of the Health Care Compact, the Ohio Health Care Compact (HB 34) has passed out of State Government Committee and is eligible to be put on the Floor for a House vote.
The House Rules & Reference Committee sets the schedule for House votes.
Please contact the below GOP members of the House Rules & Reference Committee and respectfully request that they support the Health Care Compact (HB 34) and put Ohioans in charge of their own health care destiny.
With your support and immediate action, we can move one step closer to achieving our goal of true health care freedom for all Ohio citizens and remove ourselves from under Governor Kasich's Medicaid expansion!
Rules & Reference Committee
GOP Members
Rep. Ron Amstutz / Chair
Phone: (614) 466-1474
Contact: Click Here
Rep. Cliff Rosenberger / Vice-Chair
Phone: (614) 466-3506
Contact: Click Here
Rep. Andrew Brenner
Phone: (614) 644-6711
Contact: Click Here
Rep. Bill Hayes
Phone: (614) 466-2500
Contact: Click Here
Rep. Ron Hood
Phone: (614) 466-1464
Contact: Click Here
Rep. Stephanie Kunze
Phone: (614) 466-8012
Contact: Click Here
Rep. Dorothy Pelanda
Phone: (614) 466-8147
Contact: Click Here
Rep. Scott Ryan
Phone: (614) 466-1482
Contact: Click Here
Please call your OH House member and tell them to support the Health Care Compact - Click for OH House Directory.
Labels:
General,
HB 34,
Health Care Compact,
ObamaCare,
Ohio House
Wednesday, June 17, 2015
Trans-Pacific Partnership : House passes the bill
Art credit: Radix
UPDATE Thurs. From Breitbart Big Government:
Obamatrade is alive.
One week after the House of Representatives overwhelmingly rejected Obamatrade by voting against a key provision of it — Trade Adjustment Assistance — GOP establishment lawmakers resuscitated Trade Promotion Authority and rammed it through Thursday afternoon. The final tally was 218-208. . . .
. . . Because the Senate passed TAA and TPA together, the individual House version will now have to go back to the Senate for approval, where it may face a filibuster. It’s unclear how many senators would support TPA without TAA, a measure to aid workers who lose their jobs because of trade policy.
# # #
According to The Hill, the House will vote
Thursday [tomorrow] on a stand-alone measure to grant President Obama fast-track trade
authority.
Phyllis Schlafly
explains how bad the bills are:
On
Friday, Congress disrupted President Obama’s plan for a sweeping transfer of
U.S. sovereignty to an unaccountable group of foreign busybodies. Hurray for
the stalwart Americans who resisted the demands of Obama, the Republican
leadership and the big-donor claque – but Speaker Boehner plans to give
Congress another chance this week to make this dangerous mistake.
The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) would turn over to
globalists the power to issue regulations about U.S. trade, immigration, the
environment, labor and commerce. It’s called a “living agreement,” which means
the globalists can amend and change the text of the so-called agreement after
it has gone into effect.
Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., has frankly warned about this
giveaway of U.S. sovereignty. Not only would Congress give up its powers to
negotiate and write the terms of a treaty, but Congress also gives up its power
to debate and amend the deal, to apply a cloture vote in the Senate, and to
require a two-thirds vote in the Senate.
. . .
TPP puts us in a new political and economic union before a
single private citizen is told about it and with public opinion running five to
one against it. Remember when Nancy Pelosi said we had to pass Obamacare in
order to find out what is in it?
Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., warns, “TPP calls for the formation
of a permanent political and economic union known as the Trans-Pacific
Partnership Commission, which will have power to issue regulations impacting
not only trade but immigration, the environment, labor and commerce.” He added,
Congress “will have surrendered its legislative prerogatives. Before a word,
line, paragraph, or page of this plan is made public, Congress will have even
agreed to give up its treaty powers.”
. . .
Sessions continued: “Congress would be pre-clearing a political
and economic union before a word of that arrangement has been made available to
a single private citizen. This has the earmarks of a nascent European Union,”
and Americans certainly don’t want to belong to a European union (that’s why we
fought the American Revolution).
Rep. Hunter also warns that the new global governance
institution would be “authorized to issue policies and regulations affecting
our economy, our manufacturers, our workers, our immigration procedures, as
well as current, labor and environmental practices.”
TPP is separating us from the U.S. Constitution and from
national sovereignty and replacing both with a global governance
superstructure. TPP has wrapped its audacious global governance plan in the
mantle called “free trade,” which is a misnomer if there ever were one.
Read the rest here.
And here’s an update
from today’s Politico:
House Speaker John Boehner
and Republican leaders are moving to revive President Barack Obama’s
beleaguered trade agenda with an elaborate procedural workaround that was
quickly greeted with skepticism among some Democrats.
Under the emerging plan,
the House would vote on a bill that would give Obama fast-track authority to
negotiate a sweeping trade deal with Pacific Rim countries, sending it to the
Senate for final approval. To alleviate Democratic concerns, the Senate then
would amend a separate bill on trade preferences to include Trade Adjustment
Assistance, a worker aid program that Republicans oppose but that House
Democrats have blocked to gain leverage in the negotiations over fast-track.
NationalReview Online reports:
When a group of House conservatives
voted last week to kill a trade bill favored by President Obama, House Speaker
John Boehner and other GOP leaders who support the measure steamed.
Representative Mick Mulvaney (R., S.C.) celebrated the revolt as a
coming-of-age moment for rebel backbenchers. “Yesterday will be the day that we
look back at as the day that conservatives finally started getting organized in
the House,” he wrote in a note to the Spartanburg Tea Party.
Led by
Representative Jim Jordan (R., Ohio), a platoon of conservatives demanded that
Boehner agree to a series of concessions in exchange for their support for
so-called Trade Promotion Authority (TPA), legislation that would give
President Obama wider latitude to negotiate free-trade agreements. When GOP
leadership ignored them, Jordan and his allies tried to kill the bill on a
procedural vote — a rare step made more surprising by the lawmakers’ general
support for free trade. It was the boldest attempt yet from the recently formed
House Freedom Caucus, which Jordan chairs, to counteract Boehner’s perceived
tendency to wilt in the face of Democratic pressure.
Read more
here.
Find your
Representative here. The Congressional switchboard number is (202) 224-3121.
Here are details for Ohio Senators:
Sen.
Sherrod Brown
Phone: 202-224-2315
Fax: 202-228-6321
Phone: 202-224-3353
#
# #
Monday, June 15, 2015
Reminder: End Obamacare Exemption on Weds. noon
Reminder:
End Obamacare Exemption : on June 17 [this coming Weds.] at noon, patriots across the country will visit and call their representatives to demand that they no longer enjoy an exemption from Obamacare. For far too long, the "Ruling Class" politicians have lived above the law while the American people suffer. Help end that special Obamacare exemption. Find the office of your representative at this map. Plan to visit or call.
See our earlier blog here.
# # #
Saturday, June 13, 2015
Drudge: Republicans Plan New Obamatrade Push
WASHINGTON—U.S. Sen. Jeff Sessions
(R-AL) issued the following statement today [June 12] regarding the vote to
give President Obama expanded fast-track executive authorities:
“It appears there will be another
attempt by Tuesday to force through new executive powers for President Obama. A
vote for TAA next week is a vote to send fast-track to the President’s desk and
to grant him these broad new executive authorities. If that happens, it will
empower the President to form a Pacific Union encompassing 40 percent of the
world’s economy and 12 nations—each with one equal vote. Once the union is
formed, foreign bureaucrats will be required to meet regularly to write the
Commission’s rules, regulations, and directives—impacting Americans’ jobs,
wages, and sovereignty. The union is chartered with a “Living Agreement,” and
there is no doubt it will seek to expand its membership and reach over time.
Fast-track will not only apply to the
Pacific Union, but can expedite an unlimited number of yet-unseen international
compacts for six years. There are already plans to advance through fast-track
the Trade in Services Agreement, the goal of which includes labor mobility
among more than 50 nations, further eroding the ability of the American people
to control their own affairs.
Americans do not want this, did not ask
for it, and are pleading from their hearts for their lawmakers to stop it.
The same people projecting the benefits
of leaping into a colossal new economic union could not even accurately predict
the impact of a standalone agreement with South Korea. The latter deal, which
promised to boost our exports to them $10 billion, instead only budged them
less than $1 billion, while South Korea’s imports to us increased more than $12
billion, nearly doubling our trading deficit. This new agreement will only
further increase our trading deficit: opening our markets to foreign imports
while allowing our trading partners to continue their non-tariff barriers that
close their markets to ours.
If we want a new trade deal with Japan,
or with Vietnam, then they should be negotiated bilaterally and sent to
Congress under regular order. Under no circumstances should the House
authorize, through fast-track, the formation of a new international commission
that will regulate not only trade, but immigration, labor, environmental, and
all manner of commercial policy.
What American went to the polls in 2014
to vote for fast-track and a new global union? Can anyone honestly say that
Congress is trying to ram this deal through because they think their
constituents want it?
While elites dream of a world without
borders, voters dream of a world where the politicians they elect put this
country’s own citizens first.
The movement among Americans toward a
decent, honest populism—toward a refocusing on the needs of American citizens
and American interests—grows stronger by the day. Every vote to come before
Congress, beginning with the next fast-track push, will face this test: does
your plan strengthen or weaken the social and economic position of the loyal,
everyday working American?”
Michelle Malkin has more
sobering comments here.
Ted Cruz has come out
in support of the bill.
Why would Congress pass (let alone rush to pass ~ without reading) a bill that further compromises the sovereignty of the
United States?
#
# #
Thursday, June 11, 2015
End Obamacare Exemption
End Obamacare
Exemption : Sen. David Vitter’s bill
Art credit: Sodahead.com
Next week, on June 17
at noon, patriots across the country will visit and call their representatives
to demand that they no longer enjoy an exemption from Obamacare. For far too long, the "Ruling
Class" politicians have lived above the law while the American people
suffer. Help end that special Obamacare exemption.
For the 60-second ad being run across the country, go here (scroll down;
it’s on the left-hand side). For more info, go to Sen David Vitter's website here.
Mark your calendar
for Weds., June 17 at noon. Find the office of your representative at this map. Plan to visit or call.
# # #
Tuesday, June 9, 2015
King vs. Burwell and Obamacare
Art credit: crooks and liars.com
The King
vs. Burwell case is expected to be decided by the Supreme Court at the end of
June. The SCOTUS could strike down Obamacare subsidies in 34 non-exchange
states. Here is an interactive map showing the status of each state and its
health care exchanges. Ohio is
one of seven states categorized as “Federally facilitated marketplace; state
conducting plan management.”
Last
week, Betsy McCaughey identified the potential winners and losers if SCOTUS
strikes down the subsidies:
If Supremes slap
ObamaCare, it’s health insurers who lose
. . . the Supreme
Court ruling in King v. Burwell, expected this month . . . will determine the
fate of these subsidies in 37 states.
Without subsidies,
ObamaCare buyers in those states will have to pay the actual — and unaffordable
— sticker price of ObamaCare. And you — taxpayers — will not have to fork over
hundreds of billions of dollars to subsidize insurers over the next decade.
But the dirty
secret is that insurers stand to lose the most from King v. Burwell.
The Affordable Care
Act compels the public to buy their product, and forces taxpayers to subsidize
it. What a sweetheart deal.
The giant players —
United Healthcare, Cigna, Aetna, Anthem and Humana — have seen stock prices
double, triple, even quadruple since the law was passed in 2010. The coming
ruling threatens to put an end to their gravy train.
Democrats are
predicting disaster if the court rules against President Obama.
Republicans will
“rue the day” they let millions of people lose their subsidies, says Nancy
Pelosi. That’s crazy talk.
No one will lose
their coverage immediately, the poor will be unaffected and the biggest losers will
be insurance companies.
Employers,
job-seekers and taxpayers actually stand to win here.
In addition, most
Republicans in Congress are inclined to compromise with the president to
provide some type of financial help for insurance buyers. If the Supremes gut
ObamaCare, there will be many more winners than losers. Here’s how it shakes
out:
The Affordable Care
Act says subsidies will be provided only in states that set up their own
exchanges. But only a handful of states (including New York) did.
In 37 states that
didn’t, people use the federal healthcare.gov Web site instead. The Obama
administration handed out subsidies to these people anyway, playing fast and
loose with the law — and your money.
If the justices
rule that the Obama administration can’t do that, some 7.7 million people will
eventually lose their subsidies.
. . .
Insurance companies
are lobbying furiously for a congressional fix.
Meanwhile, outside
Washington, DC, a ruling nixing the subsidies will benefit employers and
job-seekers.
Any of the 37
states that want to can set up an exchange and immediately qualify for the
subsidies. But most are controlled by the GOP and won’t do it.
Without subsidies,
the employer mandate is toothless, because employers are only fined if their
uninsured workers go to an exchange and get a subsidy.
Employers who have
been struggling to keep their workforce under 50 (where ObamaCare kicks in) and
use part-timers (who aren’t subject to ObamaCare) won’t have to worry any more.
Nullifying the employer mandate is likely to ignite a hiring boom.
According to the US
Chamber of Commerce, that looming mandate has caused 21 percent of small
businesses to reduce workers’ hours, 41 percent to delay hiring and 27 percent
of franchises (such as fast-food restaurants) to replace full-timers with
part-timers.
People facing a
penalty for being uninsured will also come out ahead. Without subsidies, most
will be exempted from the penalty, saving them $2,000 on average next year.
Despite Democrats’
dire warnings, the poor won’t be hurt. An amazing 89 percent of people who are
newly insured because of ObamaCare are on Medicaid, which won’t be affected.
Ignore the alarmist
rhetoric. A loss for the Obama administration in King v. Burwell will be a win
for most Americans.
Read the entire article here.
# # #
Labels:
health care,
insurance,
King vs Burwell,
ObamaCare,
Ohio,
state subsidies
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)