Back in July, under the title “An Alternative to Blowing Up
the Sun,” this blog linked to reports of some demented climate change warriors who
suppose they can fix allegedly man-made climate problems by “Dimming the Sun.” Now it’s actually happening. Someone writing under the name 'Raw Egg
Nationalist' just published an analysis at The
National Pulse about actual atmospheric interference -- interference that
is so irresponsible and idiotic that it’s hard to believe it’s true:
Corporates Have Begun ‘Geoengineering’ The
Climate,
With Basically No One’s Consent
The deployment of sulphur dioxide into the
atmosphere
is one of the ways the climate change lobby
are considering manipulating the weather
An American startup firm has
admitted to releasing reactive particles into the atmosphere in an attempt to
alter the climate. The move has attracted widespread criticism, and marks a
potentially dangerous new stage in the intensifying response to Earth’s
“climate crisis”.
Just before Christmas 2022, the
firm ‘Make Sunsets’ acknowledged it
had launched weather balloons containing sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere.
The launches took place in April 2022, in Baja California, Mexico, months
before the company was even incorporated.
When quizzed about it, the
company’s CEO, Luke Iseman, was
unrepentant. “It’s morally wrong, in my opinion, for us not to be doing
this”, he said, adding that it’s important “to do this as quickly and safely as
we can,” because of the threat of man-made climate change.
Critics, including geoengineers,
say Make Sunset’s efforts are dangerous, not only because the field is very
much in its infancy, but also because they could have wildly different effects
from those intended.
“The current state of science is
not good enough… to either reject, or to accept, let alone implement” solar
geoengineering, said
Janos Pasztor, executive director of the Carnegie Climate Governance Initiative,
which seeks to impose restrictions on geoengineering projects. “To go ahead
with implementation at this stage is a very bad idea.”
Other scientists believe this
unannounced and unmonitored release of chemicals into the atmosphere could set
the science back, disrupting its funding and leading to public calls to
restrict research. The move has been compared to other reckless innovations,
including the use of CRISPR gene-editing technology by
a Chinese scientist on human embryos, without proper evaluation of the
safety and ethics of doing so. . . .
Mr. Raw Egg N concludes:
Given the pace of change, and the
determination of our leaders – and now captains of industry – to reshape the
world with or without our consent, we need to find ways to make our voices
heard, fast. We must realize that it makes no difference to withdraw consent
retroactively, especially when what’s done cannot be undone.
Read the complete analysis here.
# # #
