My caption would be "They smell weakness":
meme via Patriot Post
# # #
I continue to post updates on the COVID crisis because it is threatening our basic freedoms. While some states have banned vaccine mandates, such as Texas, Ohio has not yet voted. And now we are being told that the FDA has given its full approval to the Pfizer vaccine. I’ve already asked how long-term effects can be studied when there has not been a long-term testing period. So below is an extract from Carl Schwitzer’s “The FDA did NOT grant full approval to the Pfizer shots” at AmericanThinker:
You may have heard that the
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 shot received FDA approval this past
Monday. Politicians, national health officials, and journalists are
breathless with excitement about how this approval will finally induce the
remaining "vaccine-hesitant" into stepping forward to receive their
jab. The FDA even has a press release on
its website about it.
There's just one problem.
If you read the actual letters that
the FDA sent to Pfizer on August 23, 2021, you'll see that the FDA did
no such thing. In the sense that the term "FDA
approval" is generally understood, this drug is not approved by
the FDA. It is still under EUA (Emergency Use
Authorization). It is still an experimental drug.
The FDA sent two
letters. The first one was a letter of BLA
(Biologics License Application) approval, and the second was a letter of EUA
extension to COMIRNATY.
The BLA approval letter approves
Pfizer's application for a license to label its COVID-19 drug with the brand
name COMIRNATY. This letter also spells out the terms and
requirements for nine additional clinical trials over five years [my emphasis], and yearly
status reports, to study the acknowledged occurrences of myocarditis and
pericarditis that have followed the administering of the Pfizer
shots. This license to label and manufacture is not a full approval
of the drug, which clearly is still subject to many years of clinical trials [my emphasis].
The EUA extension letter extends
the term of the EUA for the current drug and authorizes (licenses) the
experimental use of the brand-name drug COMIRNATY. In the first
paragraph on page 2, this letter references the license approval letter. In
the second paragraph on page 2, the August 12 EUA is re-issued to include the
name-branded drug in the emergency use authorization, and to add "language
regarding warnings and precautions related to myocarditis and
pericarditis." In the last paragraph on page 4, the EUA nature
of the drugs is re-iterated, and COMIRNATY is additionally authorized for use
for individuals aged 12 through 15 years.
The mRNA gene therapy shots are
still experimental. Mandating them is still wrong — by a wide
variety of ethical standards.
Dr. Meryl Nass, M.D. found the
truths that the FDA buried in the blather of these letters and offers a theory about
why it was done this way. The drug-manufacturers were granted
immunity from liability for the drugs produced under the EUAs. The
granting of the license re-applies the customary liability for injury and death
caused by the product. Pfizer, the health officials, and the
politicians get to take a fictitious victory lap for the "approval,"
while Pfizer-BioNTech continues to stealthily enjoy immunity from product
liability because there are many millions of the unlicensed doses on the
shelves and in the manufacturing pipeline that will be administered
first. The licensed version will not arrive on shelves or be jabbed
into arms for many months to come.
. . .
The rest of the column is here. Becker News has another report on the same subject. I am linking
here, as the analyses are a bit difficult to follow, and a second report may help to clarify. One thing is clear: we are being lied to
again.
#
# #
Thomas T. Siler, M.D. has a very good column at American Thinker. He opens with this:
Now that we have had 18 months to
“slow the spread” it is time to take stock of the pandemic. We have learned
many good things that the media and our pandemic managers rarely report. Most
fundamentally, we do not need to be afraid of COVID-19 anymore. The media and
some government health authorities are still pushing hysteria and fear, but
that should not prevail.
And he closes his column with:
We do not need to be afraid of
COVID-19 anymore. Let’s begin to end the hysteria and fear. The worst is over
and we are transitioning
to endemic status which means a low level of cases and deaths.
We will have many fewer deaths if
we start to treat the infection early now with the available outpatient
treatments. We should resist further attempts at lockdowns and mask mandates as
neither worked. We know exactly whom to protect—the elderly and those with
chronic health problems. That’s where we should concentrate our energies.
Thankfully, children have very
little risk and do not need masks at school or vaccinations. Variants will come
but will not send us back into a situation like last year.
Can our pandemic managers take some
of this useful information and transform it into helpful public health policies
from this point forward? Or is there another agenda behind unending hysteria,
fear, and the constant push for 100% vaccination? That remains to be seen. For
now, let's celebrate the good news.
Dr. Siler’s column is here. As to his closing question: “is there another agenda behind unending hysteria, fear, and the constant push for 100% vaccination?” Well, here’s the photograph from Australia that we posted the other day:
# # #
The FDA warns us not to take ivermectin for COVID. Cleveland.com reported on that warning, which states that the FDA “has not approved the drug for that purpose” [my emphasis].The same can be said for a cocktail of hydroxychloroquine and zinc; that’s why a prescription is called “off-label.”
On the other hand, American Partisan links to various inexpensive over-the-counter or readily available therapeutics that are effective in mitigating symptoms of the WuFlu. Ivermectin tops the list. Ivermectin has been taken extensively in, for example, India, with a high success rate; Daniel Horowitz reports here.
Who do you trust?
# # #
Here’s a thumbnail history of vast right-wing conspiracies by Janet Levy at American Thinker. The historian, Gary Allen, thought he was researching history in order to “prove conservative anti-communists wrong.” He came to the opposite conclusion. Here’s the opening:
Fifty years ago, journalist Gary
Allen set out to write a book to prove conservative anti-communists
wrong. But while researching, he realized he had not seen the
"hidden picture." There indeed was a conspiracy, shielded
by a narrative advanced by liberal academia and the mainstream media, both
actually in the service of an elite cabal that included Rockefeller, Ford,
Morgan, Rothschild, Loeb, Kennedy, and Carnegie. No longer willing
to dismiss "right-wing conspiracy theorists," he titled his book,
published in 1971, None Dare Call It
Conspiracy. It was a surprising bestseller: more than four
million copies were sold during the 1972 presidential
elections. Many received it as gifts through an informal grassroots
distribution system.
What Allen claimed to have
discovered was that a plutocracy of 3% of the population covertly controlled
the lives of the rest. They had wrested control of the
constitutional republic, with its separation of powers, limited government, and
competitive free enterprise, and turned it into a system of centralized control
by a few. How was this achieved? According to Allen, the
conspiratorial clique was hidden and protected by a complicit media
establishment they own and control. Also, they are accomplished
liars and farseeing planners. Their subversive tour de force has
been to advance the lies that a) communism is inevitable and b) communism is a
movement of the downtrodden. The first lie aims to destroy the will
to fight, the second to gain the support of the poor masses and justify the
destruction of a vigorous, innovative middle class.
Allen offers an alternative,
realistic definition of communism: an international conspiratorial drive for
power on part of men in high places, who are willing to use any means for
global conquest. In The Communist Manifesto, Marx and Engels
said a proletarian revolution would necessitate a temporary socialist
dictatorship, which would give way to full-on communism if three things were
achieved: a) the elimination of private property rights, b) the dissolution of
the family, and c) the replacement of religion with Marxist
ideology. These, in fact, are exactly what academia and left-wing
groups in America are pushing for, today and when Allen wrote the book.
But all that, as Allen claims, is
an elaborate ruse. Behind it are the super-rich.
Recommended reading. Full article is here.
# # #
A few headlines -- from the hundreds crowding the internet today -- shows
the corruption, the censorship, and the growing tyranny in the western world:
From American Greatness: FDA Approves Pfizer Vaccine Even Though Multiple Safety Studies Won’t Be Completed For Years
From Freedom First Network: Vaccine-Pimping Us Surgeon General Proclaims Americans Have No Right To Spread Disinformation Which Means Anything The Regime Doesn’t Like
From Conservative Playlist:
Pandemic Panic Theater: Why All 14 ‘Gold Standard’ Randomized Controlled
Trials of Face Masks have been Suppressed
From Epoch Times via Citizen Free Press: Connecticut Goes Full Vaccine Nazi
From InfoWars via Liberty Daily: Military & Blue States Announce Vaccine Mandates MINUTES After FDA Approves Injection
And for a preview of how bad this will get, here’s Sundance
on the tyranny now on full display in Australia and New Zealand:
Australian Police Beating More People in the Streets Than the Taliban
# # #