The Mask of The Green Cult

 

image credit: yuuuuup8000.blogspot

“The Mask of The Green Cult.”  Sounds like a science fiction movie.  Except that it’s all around us, for real.  Adam Vicari at American Thinker starts his essay:

For decades now, you have heard leftist ear sores bloviate endlessly about "climate change."  The world will end in a decade if we don't take action now! screams AOC.  However, the more skeptical and rational among us tend to question the true motivation of the environmentalist Green cult.

The best example of a real environmentalist was probably conservationist John Muir, the founder of the Sierra Club.  Muir's work helped to establish a number of national parks throughout the country, an act that did not regress the progress of society for the sake of nature, but sought to preserve nature while simultaneously allowing industrial society to progress at a steady rate.  Thus, Muir sought to build something, while the modern environmentalist movement seeks only to destroy everything and anything that gets in the way of its climate crusade. 

Just take a look at the Sierra Club's website today, and see what its goals are for 2030.  Within the next seven years, the Sierra Club hopes to eliminate enough coal and gas in the energy sector to make for 80% carbon "pollution"–free electricity by that time, in addition to decreasing oil used in the transportation sector by 18%, ending the sale of gas appliances, and halting the fossil fuel market by banning oil and gas exports and petrochemical expansion at the same time.  This is an ambitious plan...and also a complete load of BS and magical thinking. 

Although it may not faze most people at first, notice how they call carbon a "pollutant" and claim they want to reduce it by 80% in electricity production.  Since when is carbon a pollutant?  Carbon is an element necessary to all life on earth. No organism can survive without it.  Indeed, the entire process on which all human life depends, photosynthesis, requires carbon dioxide.  In order for plants to produce oxygen for living beings to breathe, they must first collect carbon dioxide dispelled from the living being breathing the air they are producing.  Numerous studies have indicated that areas with higher carbon concentration are more green and more fertile, not less. 

So why would the Green cult want to reduce the amount of carbon in the atmosphere? . . . .

Why indeed?  Mr. Vicari has some good guesses.  Read his column here.

# # #

Bill Gates recommends Fake Food

 

Dr Joseph Mercola doesn’t think much of bazillionaire Bill Gates and his elitist de-populationist fake food agenda.  Dr Mercola is posting, as usual, at NOQ, and here’s the bullet point summary:

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• Bill Gates appears to be behind the push to stop breastfeeding and encourage uptake of BIOMILQ, a cell-cultured “human milk” made in a lab, along with other varieties of fake food
• Nearly every large meat and dairy processor/manufacturer has also acquired or developed plant-based meat and dairy substitutes
• This “protein” industry convergence is jeopardizing the resilience of the food system and reducing genetic diversity of livestock and crops
• When you factor in soy production as well as the use of conventional energy sources, lab-grown meat may be worse for the environment than conventionally produced chicken and pork
• There are signs that the fake meat industry may be failing before it ever gets off the ground; shares of Beyond Meat lost $6 billion since March 2020 due to weak sales growth
• To save the planet and support your health, skip all the fake meat alternatives and opt for real food that’s being raised using regenerative, grass fed methods

Click here for the full article.  My caveat:  In the article, one of the sections is headed “Abbott [Nutrition’s Sturgis, Michigan facility] Enriched Shareholders While Formula Sickened Babies.” Maybe, but maybe not.  From a reader comment posted by lakerman1 at Lucianne.com:

These are the facts as I understand them. Two babies became ill and died, and two more became ill but survived. A particular bacterium existed in all four babies, and all four babies were on Abbott formula. The federal inspectors went to Abbott, but did not find the bacterium in secure processing areas, but found it in external, non-secure areas of the plant. So the FDA shut down the entire plant. It is much more likely that the four babies’ formula bottles were contaminated by their caregivers in preparing the bottles.

For one thing, I wouldn’t trust the FDA any more than I trust the CDC, NIH, FBI, or DOJ.

# # #