A F Branco cartoon seen at Townhall
# # #
The Green New Deal, the New World Order, or by whatever name
you call it – our betters at the World Economic Forum want us to eat bugs instead of meat. John Hinderaker at PowerLine takes it
seriously:
The Left’s two main targets, so
far, are fertilizers and animal husbandry. What is the end game? Leftists want
us to eat a largely vegetarian diet, with insects as a protein source instead
of cows, pigs and poultry.
This is no secret if you follow
leftist writing, but many people find it hard to believe. To be fair, there is
a great deal about modern liberalism that I find hard to believe. But the plan
to convert us all to insect-eaters is real.
Thus this headline: EU Gives Green Light for Use of Two Insect Species in Human Food.
For a deeper dive on how all this is fulfilling the Davos
crowd’s dreams of making us eat insects, here’s part of Itxu Diaz’s column at The American Conservative:
Until now, common sense led us to
unhesitatingly step on any insects we find dragging their bellies across the
kitchen floor. But currently, the masters of the universe are set on correcting
this practice: They prefer you to eat them.
In recent months there has been a
worldwide campaign, especially intense in the European Union, to convince us to
incorporate crickets and worms into our diet. And, as we are not yet crazy
enough to do so, they have found a way to make us do it anyway: by including
them as a substitute for flour and protein in products we consume on a daily
basis.
. . .
It is a battle that can obviously
be won on the street without much effort. I don't know anyone who wants to
leave their children a world where you can only get around by bicycle or, at
best, electric cars, where heating is banned, and at lunchtime you find a salad
with crickets, worms, and fake steaks by Bill Gates waiting for you on your
plate. That is not a world, that is hell.
For centuries, much of the
superiority of Western civilization has been apparent in our food. There is no
need to give our moral decline a seat at the dinner table. Refusing to eat
insects is a show of respect and obedience to our mothers, who, when as babies
we lifted bugs from the ground to our mouths, told us, "Don't eat
that!"
The PowerLine
report is here. The American Conservative
report is here. In our household, we’re
starting to read labels on packaged food even more carefully.
# # #
Antonio Graceffo at The Epoch Times reports on some of the basics of the World Economic Forum (WEF) and why this blog continues to follow the developments:
. . . The WEF effectively
recommends policies on everything, from creating digital identity systems and restructuring the
global political system to the cessation of fossil fuel
use, individual car ownership, and the banning of eating meat.
Even though it’s a private
organization with no global or political authority, the event was attended by a
long and distinguished list of elected officials and political appointees. This
year, 51 heads of state, including Germany’s Chancellor Olaf
Scholz, presidents of Spain, South Korea, Poland, and the Philippines, and
China’s Vice-Premier Liu He, in addition to 56 finance ministers, 19 central
bank governors, 30 trade ministers, and 35 foreign ministers, were at the
forum.
Also present were the heads of
global organizations, such as IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva,
European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde, World Health Organization
Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, NATO Secretary General Jens
Stoltenberg, and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.
A U.S. congressional delegation was also there,
including Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), Chris Coons (D-Del.), Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.),
and Gov. Brian Kemp (R-Ga.). On the industry side, there were more
than 600 CEOs like JP Morgan’s Jamie Dimon, Goldman Sachs’
David Solomon, and Morgan Stanley’s James Gorman. . . .
. . . The WEF is a globalist organization
that wants to compromise the sovereignty of nations, rewrite the world order,
and dictate how we live, eat, and think. And for some reason, our leaders and
media support them.
As powerful as the WEF participants may be, there are more of
us little people than there are of them, and this blog is trying to stay on top of developments. At the end of the day, I like Neil Oliver’s attitude:
They think they’ve got us scared enough to accept the whole damned lot of it. Here’s the thing: I am not afraid of them. I don’t even take them seriously.
Read the rest of Mr Graceffo's column here.
# # #
How to fight the New World Order? Over the past weekend, Neil Oliver released his latest
monologue, and it is a doozy. Here’s
part of the transcript:
. . . What should we do? How can we fight
back?
I think about the answers to those
questions all the time. Right now, I wonder what would happen if those who are
cold in their homes – millions of people – just turned on their heating and
turned off their direct debits and standing orders. What would happen if, when
the bills came, we all just agreed to toss them on the fire? All of us
together? What would happen, if millions of us, peacefully acting as one just
stood together in quiet defiance? I could be wrong, but I don’t think there’s
enough cells in the prisons, enough judges to hear the cases. If the system
wasn’t already broken – by them – such actions would break it.
What would happen if we all
withdrew our money from the banks on the same day? What would happen if we all
asked, as we are entitled to, for the cash? The banks don’t have the money to
meet all those demands and so presumably they would close their doors. Then
what? Would their inability to pay out all that cash be evidence of the fraud
that is fiat money? I wonder.
I’ve said it before, and I’ll say
it again: the social contract – that notion by which we surrender power to the
state in return for services and safety – is broken beyond repair. They broke
it, not us. Successive governments – not just the present bunch of cardboard
cut-outs … have, over decades, knowingly and deliberately betrayed every aspect
of that contract. It is null and void and we, the blameless party, are no longer
bound by its conditions.
We the people – the sovereign
people of this country – don’t just hold the power: we ARE the power. We loan
some of it – a short-term loan – to governments. And those governments are
supposed to serve us, do our bidding. NEVER the other way round. We tell them
what to do.
Hundreds of years’ worth of
governments has quietly and secretively presided over a financial system that
is no more than state-sanctioned fraud. Power to create money out of thin air
was put in the hands of an entirely private, unelected, unaccountable business
and this power has been abused to make a tiny group unimaginably rich by
enslaving all of US with debt. That system is now on the point of collapse. The
West is bankrupt, and governments and bankers are scrambling to solve a problem:
how to subtract every last shekel from the people while still having a handful
of wealthy bankers, and their enablers, left over.
. . .
But history tells us we should
never underestimate the power of the many.
Them’s fightin’ words. Could the strategy work? Possiby, even probably. My concern is, of course, with the iron-fisted and ruthless tactics now employed by the Deep State and the New World Order corruptocrats.
Read the full transcript here.
# # #
Conservative Treehouse / Sundance's "I Am a MAGA Republican, and Donald Trump is My Weapon" is a good explanation of America First economic policy -- and it is reader-friendly. Sundance begins:
At a national level there is a
unique policy priority that almost every politician, on both sides, will avoid
discussing. At a national level a single policy priority determines all
other national policy issues. That policy is the national economic
policy.
The national economic policy of a presidential
candidate determines all other national policies that flow from the
presidential candidate. The national economic policy impacts the obvious
policies like energy and trade, and also determines the lesser obvious policies
like regulation and even foreign policy.
It is specifically because a candidate’s national economic outlook impacts all other issues, that most national politicians never talk about it.
It would be impossible to support
Main Street USA, a popular talking point, and still support the Paris climate
treaty, the transpacific trade partnership (TPP) or the transatlantic trade and
investment partnership (TTIP).
To avoid the contradictions most
democrat and republican politicians avoid discussing their national economic
policy; it is an unspoken rule within the billionaire club and donor game; an
economic code of omerta amid most political candidates.
President Trump broke the rule, and even went so far as to campaign on an America-First economic policy agenda. . . .
The full article is here, and it concludes with an analogy to
a technician who can get rid of all those destructive raccoons in your basement. Makes it fun and accessible.
# # #
Another excellent cartoon by A F Branco at Townhall:
# # #
No, I did not watch the prime time telecast of the first January
6 Insurrection “hearing.” Neither did Legal Insurrection’s William A. Jacobson. Here’s part of his rationale:
Inflation Soars to 41-Year High, While Democrats and Mainstream Media Focus On J6 Primetime Show Trial
I stayed true to my promise, "I’m
Not Watching The Made-for-TV J6 Show Trial Narrated By Hoaxers, Liars, and
Leakers," which as I wrote is just a political distraction from the intentional
gutting of the country:
The southern border is effectively
open, we have lost our sovereignty as a nation. Food prices and gas and other
measures of inflation are out of control.
Sure enough, this morning brought an inflation report that shows the damage from Bidenomics. CNBC reports:
. . .
There is no silver lining . . .
Ugh. Professor Jacobson’s column is here. On the brighter side, the ratings weren't all that great. The Washington Free Beacon reports here; see also here.
In the aftermath of the SOTU speech yesterday evening (some are reporting it as a comedy routine), A.F. Branco's cartoon about "the good ol' days" seems apropos:
# # #