Electoral College History page
I had not seen reference to an “Electoral College compact”
until now. Here is Glenn K. Beaton’s “Dems shooting themselves in foot with
Electoral College compact” at the Aspen Times:
Dems are still smarting from losing
the 2016 presidential election by losing the Electoral College.
So they have an idea. Apart from
the dubious constitutionality of their idea, it's a bad one which can only help
the GOP.
. . . [then follows a good summary of the
Electoral College]
The Dems would like to abolish this
system because it hurt them in 2016. Of course, it could help them in some
election in the future, but politicians don't have the analytical ability to
fight any war but the last one.
Despite the Dems' wish, the College
won't be abolished. That would require an amendment to the Constitution. The
odds of that happening are 0.00 percent.
Here's their fallback idea.
The states would enter into a
"compact" that would work something like a multiparty contract. They
would each agree that they would cast their respective College votes for the
candidate that wins the national popular vote. If all the states entered into
this compact, and if it survived Constitutional challenges, then the winner of
the popular vote would thereby win all the electoral votes. Every election
would be a 538-to-0 decision in the College.
But in the real world, not all
states will enter into this compact. That's because the College currently seems
to favor the GOP. Sure, the blue states like California, New York and Illinois
will sign up. But red states like Texas and the rest of the south and the
mountain states won't. And purple states like Ohio, Florida, Pennsylvania and
others probably won't.
So only the blue states will be
bound by their compact.
. . .
Here's the bottom line.
Unless the Dems convince plenty of
red or at least purple states to join their compact, which is unlikely, the net
effect of their compact will be that they will override the will of their
citizens only when their citizens vote for the Dem candidate.
Mr. Beaton’s article is here and it’s worth a read. But I am
more apprehensive than he is. Considering how the integrity of our elections
remains at risk (see Judi McLeod today at Canada Free Press here, for example),
I would view the "compact" as just another attempt to rig the system.
# # #
