Election
Integrity's Biggest Threat: Big Tech
Why
Republicans Cannot Win;
Monitor Tech Manipulations, Make Findings Public
. . . [I]n 2016, my team and I
developed the first-ever system for doing to the tech companies what they do to
us.... [W]e are monitoring what they are showing real people on those screens.
[I]n all the days we looked at
before the election, we saw pro-Hillary Clinton bias and never any pro-Trump
bias. I was a Clinton supporter, so that was fine with me, but do we really
want private companies manipulating elections on a large scale with no one
knowing and without leaving a paper trail?... If that bias had been present for
six months, millions of votes would have been shifted with no one knowing.
Some people saw vote reminders on
Google's home page. Some people saw vote reminders for months. That too can
shift votes.... [It] can determine who sends in mail ballots and can also
determine who registers to vote.
What you see again is that pattern.
It is so disturbing. The highest level of those vote reminders was seen by
moderates, then liberals, then conservatives at the bottom: fewer vote
reminders going to one particular political group. Over
time, that has an incredible impact on an election.
. . .
This is not like stuffing a ballot
box with a few hundred ballots. This is a massive manipulation. That is why
monitoring has to be set up. No laws, no regulations will ever stop this.
Monitoring can stop it cold.
As far as I know, I'm the only one
in the world doing this research and this monitoring. That is because Google is
paying off everyone else. . . .
Lots more at the link here.
Here’s Mr. Epstein’s conclusion:
Google is the biggest threat. They have the most power to manipulate, and they do so aggressively and strategically and unapologetically. They are arrogant people, in my opinion. Extremely arrogant people who think they have the power of gods. You know what? They do, and they exercise it.
(Note: the article contains some repetitions / redundancies, i.e., blocks of text that are duplicated in the article. Some editor must have gotten carried away with the cut-and-paste buttons. But the information is so important I am linking to it anyway.)
# # #
