(Image from Investors.com) Michael Ramirez knocks it out of the park. Note the details: Golf balls and clubs falling out of the cart, the empty chair knocked over, "The View" script ... all that is missing is the teleprompter! Pres. Obama's original remarks about the terrorist attacks in Libya and elsewhere here.
Steven Hayward at Power Line reports on Romney, Ohio, and the polls:
The media line right now is that
Obama is pulling away from Romney in the all-important state of Ohio, which, as
all political junkies know, is not justaswing state—it istheswing state, as no Republican has ever
won the White House without winning Ohio. (TheWall
Street Journal‘s lead story today is “Electoral Drama Shifts to Ohio.”) I spent Monday
and Tuesday in Ohio, and most everyone I spoke with—admittedly a small and
skewed sample mostly of the very good people of Ashland—says these poll numbers
and media analyses just don’t feel right. But what do we know, anyway?
Everyone seems ready to hit the Panic Button
like we’re under “launch on warning” conditions of the late Cold War—everyone’s
worried about pushing it in a moment of panic, but it never really happens
because. . . well, in a political campaign, the metaphor means what,
exactly? Bring in James Baker! Never mind that he’s 145 years old
by now, and isn’t even on Twitter.
A few observations. First, generally
speaking nail-biting elections have become the new norm for Republicans for a
while now. I recall vividly early September back in 2000 when people were
fretting that George W. Bush was faltering against Al Gore. Something
must be done! Panic buttons must be pushed! No, an old sage said to
me; it’s up to Bush. He has to do it. No one can help him much from
the outside. The “experts” say debates don’t really change the course of
elections, but I remain skeptical of this. The Nixon-Kennedy debates
surely made a difference; I think it made some difference in 1980, perhaps in
1976 (when Ford liberated Poland), and probably in 2000, when Gore’s erratic
debate performances underscored doubts about the guy—well-founded doubts, as
Gore’s subsequent madness has made clear. George W. Bush’s faltering
performance in the first debate against John Kerry in 2004 sliced into his
steady lead at the time. So let’s stay tuned; there’s a still a lot of
time between now and November for things to change.
Second, everyone should have a look atthis post on BattlegoundWatch.comfrom “keithbacker” that weighs the
situation in Ohio. It notes that Romney suffers from the lack of a clear
or forceful message, and that the auto bailout is popular in Ohio. He
leaves out one other factor: the natural gas boom, which is helping to revive
Ohio’s economy, may be rescuing Obama here. “keithbacker” notes that
Governor Kasich is giving a mixed message, as his celebration of improving
conditions in the Buckeye State help Obama there. It would be the most bitter
of ironies if hydrocarbon energy, which Obama hates and would like to kill,
turns out to have been his lifeline.The mention of Kasich
raises one other item—the large loss as the polls last fall of the referendum
on public employee union reforms. I listened to the radio spots
last fall and thought the unions were going to win. Kasich and the Ohio Republicans
clearly overreached and didn’t bring the same calculating prudence that Scott
Walker showed in Wisconsin. This loss should have been a warning sign to
the GOP that Ohio is tricky terrain.Third, “keithbacker” notes
that the Romney campaign has a strong ground game in Ohio, and this might make
the difference. Back in 2004, while Democrats were publicly boasting
about their ground game, the Bush campaign quietly went about building and
executing a much better one, and it made a huge difference. If there’s
one thing I’d expect a Bain Capital-style presidential campaign to do well, it
would be the election day get-out-the-vote ground game.
The Romney stops in Ohio must have been well-attended, since it was impossible to find a news story (here or here) that reported the size of the crowd.
Here's an update by Jazz Shaw at Hot Air on the administration's War On Coal and the HR 3409 (Stop The War on Coal Act):
In the ongoing effort to protect jobs and affordable
energy, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R.3409, the Stop the War on
Coal Act. The legislative package passed the full House with bipartisan support
by a vote of 233 to 175. This important jobs and energy package, sponsored by
Rep. Bill Johnson (R-OH), includes key measures advanced by the Energy and
Commerce Committee: the Energy Tax Prevention Act, the TRAIN Act, and the Coal
Residuals Reuse and Management Act. The legislation also includes important
measures advanced by the Natural Resources Committee and the Transportation and
Infrastructure Committee.
“Today, the House took a stand for jobs, families,
and affordable energy. On Tuesday this week, we learned of Alpha Natural
Resources will be closing 8 mines and laying off 1200 workers. I met with the
Alpha CEO shortly after the announcement, and he lamented the administration’s
regulatory assault on coal. Sadly, the list of layoffs goes on because of the
administration’s ‘all of the above, but nothing from below,’ energy policy,”
said Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI). “Coal is the cornerstone
of our economy – estimates suggest that every mining job creates an additional
3.5 jobs. We are electricity independent – and we want to stay that way.”....
The sad truth is that the
Stop the War on Coal Act has no chance of getting through the Senate
and the president would simply veto it anyway. (At least with the current
occupants of the White House and the Senate leadership.) So the layoffs
currently taking place at Alpha Natural Resources and their
subsequent losses on the market will still take place. This pattern is
being repeated across places like Ohio and Pennsylvania, but if there
is help in sight, it’s not coming soon.
The roll call vote is here. Among the No votes: Fudge, Kaptur, Kucinich, and Sutton.
Well here we are on constitution day and I'm not sure whether to celebrate or write a eulogy. If you have been following along with the entire middle east burning thing, then you know the Obama administration is blaming it on a film that outraged Muslims. The media as usual lapped up the narrative and every time the word Islam is mentioned it is usually followed by, "protesting a anti-Islamic film". Of course this is a complete falsehood. The film has been out since July and this outrage just happened to spill over on the completely random date of 9-11. If you believe this please have your IQ checked because I think you may actually be too stupid to breathe. I know our patriots are smarter than this, but there are those people that buy into this lie. Speaking of people with low IQs, I think Hollywood may bring the entire national average down. There have been celebrities tweeting that the film's producer should at very least be jailed. In some instances they would like to see him killed. Those who would like to silence the terrible film makers right to the first amendment are none other than Bette Midler, Russell Simmons and Anthea Butler. Now, we get to the meat of the situation though. Not only do private citizens want to see this guy go down but so does your government. Huh? How can that be? The United States government wants to silence a citizen from speaking out? I'm afraid so.
The government has actually used its immense resources to track down a guy who made a crappy YouTube video. The Pentagon actually asked the producer to pull this video and denounce it. Does this seem right to you? How many of you remember when people were up in arms about the piss Christ? For those of you that don't remember, piss Christ was basically a crucifix in a jar of urine. It was art according to the artist, and guess what else? It was paid for by your tax dollars! The government labeled it free speech and said you must pay for it, offended or not. So how do we go from piss Christ to hunting down and trying to silence a guy that made a barely coherent video with his own money, that offends Muslims? I'm not sure, but I can tell you this. If you do anything to hurt this administration politically or if Barack Obama feels you have slighted him in some way, watch out, you may be next on his enemies list. We know how that worked out for some and it wasn't too pretty. Have a great Constitution Day folks. See the ridiculous video that Obama and the media said caused terrorist attacks in over 17 countries below. I'm not sure Saturday Night Live could have made a worse video.
FromThe Western Center for Journalism: here's Congressman Allen West on Pres. Obama's foreign policy, Israel, and more. And this was yesterday, before the killings in Libya.
At National Review Online (“Double-Minded Republicans”), Andrew McCarthy has sobering words about why conservatives need to get out the conservative vote:
After a first term that has been historically abysmal, President Obama stands a good chance of being reelected. How can that be?
Here is the blunt explanation: We have lost a third of the country and, as if that weren’t bad enough, Republicans act as if it were two-thirds.
The lost third cannot be recovered overnight. For now, it is gone. You cannot cede the campus and the culture to the progressive, post-American Left for two generations and expect a different outcome. So even if Obama is the second coming of Jimmy Carter — and he has actually been much more effective, and therefore much worse — it is unreasonable to expect a Reagan-style landslide, and would be even if we had Reagan. The people coming of age in our country today have been reared very differently from those who were just beginning to take the wheel in the early 1980s. They have marinated in an unapologetically progressive system that prizes group discipline and narrative over free will and critical thought.
. . .
The third of the country we’ve lost may seem like a decided minority. Progressives do not need more than that, though, to run the show, not today. They proved that at their own convention this week, with the laughable platform-amendment episode.
. . .
Obama’s base, that lost third of the country, may not be as enthralled as they were in 2008. But they are committed, utterly convinced about who the villains are, and prepared to be as chameleon as it takes to reel in, from the culture they dominate, the additional 15 percent or so needed to push their guy across the finish line. That’s how what should be a landslide for his opponent becomes a squeaker.
Tea Party Patriots need to stay focused on ANY wobbly voters, those who may fall in the "enthusiasm gap,” and those even thinking about a third party candidate, in this election countdown.
If you watched or listened to Clint Eastwood's speech at the RNC the other day, you will not be surprised that his "empty chair" interview with the President has gone viral. Michelle Malkin has posted two threads with lots of creative photographs of empty chairs on display today from all over the country. Links here and here. And here's Mark Steyn's take on the RNC speech.
Eastwood's 11-minute performance is getting zillions of views on YouTube. Yesterday, just two of the postings were over the 900,000 viewers mark. There are so many postings up there now that it is impossible to keep track.