Radio Host Mark Levin Cleared on FEC Complaint

Score one for the "Great One" - Mark Levin! 

The Federal Election Commission (FEC) made public its actions in six election law enforcement cases, including one that accused radio talk show host Mark Levin of violating federal law by urging listeners to make contributions to the campaign of Scott Brown in the special Massachusetts senatorial election.

The FEC determined that Citadel Broadcasting Corp. and host Mark Levin were immune from prosecution because the federal law exempts the news media from its prohibition against corporate spending in federal elections. This expands earlier FEC rulings that have held the exemption applies to news media activity that is normal and customary.

Levin, who calls most other radio show hosts 'Back-Benchers' - Glenn Beck included - is commonly referred to as the "Great One" by Sean Hannity & Rush Limbaugh. More often than not you will hear the morning and daytime conservative radio entertainers repeating things heard on Levin's broadcasts the night before.

Besides his brilliant mind and colorful commentary, Mark Levin is the author of "Liberty & Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto" and "Men in Black: How the Supreme Court is Destroying America."

During President Reagan's years in office, Levin was an advisor to several Cabinet members, Chief of Staff for Attorney General Edwin Meese, Deputy Asst. Secretary for Elementary & Secondary Education with the Dept. of Education and Deputy Solicitor for the Dept. of Interior.

Are you wondering why Mark Levin would be a specific target and other radio hosts who did the same aren't? It may be because along with being a nationally syndicated radio host & best-selling book author, Levin is President of the Landmark Legal Foundation.  

The Landmark Legal Foundation is a legal advocacy group focused on protecting individual rights, challenging the scope and authority of government, defending free enterprise, and exposing teachers' union fraud. The Legal Landmark Foundation has fought court battles against the National Education Association, the Democratic National Committee, the AFL-CIO, Emily's List, and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to name a few.

Most recently the Landmark Legal Foundation has filed Amicus Curiae Briefs (Friend of the Court) in several high profile lawsuits by states against the federal government. 

One being in opposition of the Motion To Dismiss filed by the Dept. of Health & Human Services in the lawsuit brought forth by the State of Virginia challenging the Constitutionality of the forced health insurance mandate in the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare). The Motion To Dismiss was rejected and the case was allowed to proceed. The other is in support of Arizona's Immigration Law Appeal.  

So you can say Mark Levin is a major "Pain in the A**" for the progressive & liberal movement as a whole! As Levin says... "That's right - there I said it!"

You can listen to free audio replays of the Mark Levin Show by clicking here.

Cost of prescriptions to go up under Affordable Care Act

A misleading report from the Dept. of Health & Human Services claims that the average Medicare beneficiary will save $3,500 a year in out-of-pocket health care costs under the Affordable Care Act.

But a report issued by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office asserts that the Affordable Care Act will allow pharmaceutical companies to increase their prices for drugs that are purchased through Medicare.

So they give you a nickel while they are stealing dollars out of your back pocket!

2010 Election Results

Patriots.... November 2nd came and we met the challenge head on!  On both fronts, national & statewide, you can be proud of your hard efforts as we work to restore Fiscal Responsibility, Constitutionally Limited Government and support of the Free Markets.

Picking up a minimum of 60 House seats (9 still undecided at time of this posting) guarantees Nancy Pelosi will no longer be Speaker of the House! Here in OH, we knocked out 5 Nancy Pelosi puppets from their Congressional seats;

• District 1; Challenger Steve Chabot (R) beat incumbent Steve Driehaus (D) 52% to 45%
• District 6; Challenger Bill Johnson (R) unseated incumbent Charlie Wilson (D) 50% to 45%
• District 15; Challenger Steve Stivers (R) destroyed incumbent Mary Jo Kilroy (D) 54% to 40%
• District 16; Challenger Jim Renacci (R) bested incumbent John Boccieri (D) 52% to 41%
• District 18; Challenger Bob Gibbs (R) trounced incumbent Zack Space (D) 54% to 40%

Rob Portman (R) handily defeated Lt. Governor Lee Fisher for the seat of retiring Senator George Voinovich with 57% to 39%.

In a total takeover of Ohio, the Republicans took every State Office AND won back control of the OH House. Hopefully, presumed to be the next OH House Speaker, Bill Batchelder will be a better leader in the majority than he was as minority leader.

But these newly elected officials must understand this election was not about getting Republicans elected to office as much as it was about getting rid if big spending, big government loving politicians who failed and refused to hear the American public.  They must realize, should they fail to do what they were elected to do -- they too can be replaced.

Failing to "Turn Around Ohio", Ted Strickland was defeated by John Kasich in a hard fought Governor's race. Though it appeared this race should have been a no-brainer, it went down to the wire with Kasich ultimately prevailing over Strickland 49% to 47%.

In the race for OH Attorney General, Mike DeWine (R) carried the day with a slim defeat of incumbent OH AG Dick Cordray (D) 48% to 46%. This race was critical in our fight against Obamacare being repealed. (We will explain why in a later post).

Thwarting the efforts of George Soro's plan to take over the Secretary of State offices, John Husted (R) delivered a crushing blow with a 54% to 40% victory over Maryellen O'Shaughnessy (D) for outgoing Democrat incumbent Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner's seat.

In a mud-slinging contest by both sides, OH Rep. Josh Mandell (R) beat out incumbent Kevin Boyce (D) for State Treasurer 55% to 40% and Dave Yost (R) beat David Peppers (D) 50% to 45% for the open State Auditor seat.

While we congratulate the winners, and we will be sending them a message that, "we will be watching you as close as we did the Democrats you defeated," we offer a patriotic tip of a Tri-Corner Hat to the candidates who were unsuccessful in their bids to stop the big government and out-of-control spending incumbents.  We offer the advice of -- run again!  Do not waste the personal investment and hard work of your volunteers.

For a current election map with the results of all the Congress, Senate & Governor races in the U.S. click here. For vote totals & results in Ohio, click here.

Michelle Bachmann 1 / Chris Matthews 0

Chris Matthews and fellow talking onion heads on MSNBC (MSLSD) interviewed Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann after last nights historic over taking of the House by winning at least 58 seats (11 still undecided at the time of this posting). 

Matthews takes a shot a Bachmann asking if she is hypnotized as she stays on message and doesn't take his baited questions.  Bachmann then shoots back that while many in America are thrilled over this victory, Matthews may not feel so "tingly" right now...

Common Sense Reforms for the 112th Congress

From Taxpayers for Common Sense --

As the dawn of the 112th Congress draws near, there are several reforms Congress should enact, regardless of which party is in control. These reforms will help reinvigorate public trust and confidence in Congress, two things that are clearly lacking. In addition, these reforms just make sense.

Download a PDF of this document:  Common Sense Reforms for the 112th Congress

1. Pass Budget Bills Before the Beginning of the Fiscal Year—For the first time in recent memory, none of the twelve spending bills were enacted prior to Congress leaving town for the election, meaning a post-election “lame duck” Congress will still be working on government funding even as the first quarter of the fiscal year winds down.
    
2. Make Congress More Transparent—Committees should post all information about votes, attendance and amendments, and this should be done in real time. Furthermore, all non-classified Congressional Research Service (CRS) reports should be made available to the public. Government Accountability Office (GAO) reports should be released immediately—not subject to a 30-day member hold—and all non-classified executive branch reports to Congressional Committees should be posted on the Committee web sites.
    
3. End Accounting Gimmicks—Creating budgets based on “temporary” tax cuts, short term patches to the AMT, and routinely ignored formulas, like Medicare reimbursement rates, might soften the sticker shock of Congress’ budget bills, but creative accounting isn’t beneficial to taxpayers. Congress needs to build their budget around the costs we know we will incur, and either raise revenue or cut spending to get our fiscal house in order.
    
4. Earmark Reforms—Establish spending decision-making systems that enable Congress and the Administration to make funding decisions on the basis of competition, merit or formulas.  As we transition to this system, Congress should adopt rules that prevent earmarks for campaign contributors, make earmarks more transparent with a real-time online database that is downloadable, searchable, and sortable, and enable independent auditing of earmarks by the GAO.
    
5. Reassess Authorizations—Congress is all too happy to authorize new projects and programs for agencies that already have thousands of projects worth billions of dollars waiting to be completed. Adding to the years-long backlog of projects simply saps money from good projects and increases the likelihood of bad projects limping along.  Be it bridges, or dams, or new weapons systems, Congress must reevaluate authorized yet incomplete projects and ensure new authorization bills prioritize the needs of taxpayers over politicians.
    
6. All Bills Available to the Public 72 Hours Before Votes—Current rules provide for a waiting period between the unveiling of a bill’s text and a vote, but these rules are regularly evaded by whichever party is in control.  Congress should require a supermajority—2/3 of all seated members—to waive the rule.
    
7. Expand the Office of Congressional Ethics to Cover the Senate—The Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE), an independent body created in 2008 by the House of Representatives, has proven itself a positive force in helping police ethics. Unfortunately, it’s only authorized to cover the House. The Senate should immediately follow the House’s lead and create a fully independent office complete with subpoena power and adequate resources to help ensure Senators stay focused on making government work.
    
8. Pay As You Go (PAYGO) Enforcement—While PAYGO has had some impact on the margins, too much spending is exempted.  New discretionary spending agreed to in the budget and entitlement spending can increase annually without any impact.  Huge programs such as Alternative Minimum Tax relief, increased Medicare payments to doctors, and other measures have enjoyed waivers or outright loopholes.  If we are to close the deficit, we need PAYGO to have real teeth.
    
9. End the Automatic Pay Raise—Congress has the system wired so that unless they vote to stop it, they will receive an annual bump in salary.  This should be immediately reversed so that Congress has to have a recorded vote to increase their pay.
    
10. Disclose all Information on Official Congressional Travel—Every year lawmakers go on dozens of trips around the world on the taxpayers’ dime.  It is important that Congress occasionally travel, meet officials from other countries, and better understand America’s role in the world.  However, the public should be able to see information about cost, lodging, the lawmakers' spouses and staff who attended and trip itineraries.  This should be available online shortly after the conclusion of the trip (for security purposes).

Dennis Kucinich wants MORE Government & MORE EPA Control over your Life-- do you?

In the face of a record setting $1.3 Trillion deficit, national debt of nearly $13 Trillion and the current Miracle-Gro type growth of our federal government, Congressman Dennis Kucinich (OH-10) recently stated he believes we need even MORE spending & MORE government in our life.

Let's take a look at a few samples of what MORE government means....

Controlling our water system --

This Colorado River Basin Geographic Focus Study is part of the ongoing effort outlined in the WaterSMART Secretarial Order signed in February 2010. It reflects a national commitment to understanding water availability in the country and managing that resource for current and future generations. The last comprehensive assessment of water availability for our nation was in 1978 and it is overdue for a new one.

The USGS WaterSMART initiative will produce a water census for the nation, a new and on-going appraisal for water availability that links both water quality and quantity, tracks changing flow, use, and storage of water, as well as developing models and predictive tools to guide its decisions . A relatively new area of science evaluates how much water needs to be left in the streams to support important ecological values. This initiative includes a significant research and assessment effort to help wildlife managers characterize the flow needs for aquatic species and their habitat. Knowing our nation’s water “assets” and rates of use on an ongoing basis is crucial to wise management.

With our Great Lakes under constant threat, we here in OH should share a special interest in this government take over of water. Click here to see the impact on you when the government takes over water supplies.

Setting a future precedent, the EPA, through the Chesapeake Clean Water and Ecosystem Restoration Act (S. 1816)  is emasculating State control of their land & waterways through the Clean Water Act....

“Bigger federal government and expanded federal authority is not in the best interest of our nation,” Stallman said. “By granting EPA the authority to issue what are called Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) without allowing states the opportunity to address water issues, this bill would give EPA greater control over land-use decisions that should be made at the local level.”

According to a letter sent to the full Senate by Farm Bureau and the other groups, S. 1816 “is not a regional bill with only local consequences and only benign effects for the rest of the country.”

“S. 1816 does not authorize a program to improve water quality through collaboration, technical assistance, and/or funding,” the letter stated. “Instead, S. 1816 would set a major legislative precedent in federal environmental law, taking the authority and control granted to states and local governments under the Clean Water Act and instead vest it in the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) – a step never before taken in the 38-year history of the law.

You're thinking, "clean water is good, but do they really want to take control of ALL water?"  You decide...

The legislation, entitled “America’s Commitment to Clean Water Act”, seeks to expand the federal government’s control of U.S. water under the Clean Water Act by removing the existing requirement that regulated waterways be “navigable.”  Under the proposed legislation, all inland waters, on both public and private lands, would be controlled and regulated by the federal government.

On December 8, 2009, Congressional Western Caucus Chairman Rob Bishop (R-UT) along with fellow House and Senate Western Caucus members outlined their concerns in a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) regarding the Senate “Clean Water Restoration Act” (S.787) and the anticipated introduction of similar legislation in the House.

Removing "non-navigable" would give the EPA control of all water from the pond in your front yard to the puddle in your back yard after it rains. If you think your sewer bills from the Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District are high now -- wait until the EPA imposes more unattainable restrictions.

Controlling our Food & Agriculture --

Are you thinking that is for farms -- they can't control air in our homes...  Think Again! 

“The Obama EPA’s unprecedented attempts to regulate dust on farms and ranches is just another example of how out-of-touch this administration is. Clear evidence acknowledges that the dust standard revision is unnecessary. Yet despite results from scientific studies, the EPA is continuing its attempts to control the day-to-day operations on ranches and farms.

“This unreasonable requirement will cause extreme hardship to farmers, livestock producers and other resource-based industries throughout rural America. People in the West and those in dry climates will be hit especially hard. It’s time the EPA rethink the consequences the farm dust regulation will have on the people who feed us.”

The goal of these projects is to educate Americans on how to reduce the environmental health risks of indoor contaminants through demonstrations, education projects, trainings and outreach efforts. EPA is placing particular emphasis on reaching households with children, low income families, and minorities because they are disproportionately impacted by poor indoor air quality.

The cooperative agreements will:

• Promote positive indoor air quality management practices in schools nationwide, including holistic approaches to environmental issues.

• Create awareness to reduce asthma triggers in the home and encourage the use of an asthma management plan.

• Increase the number of homes tested for radon and built with radon-resistant features, and increase mitigation of radon in existing homes.

• Increase effective indoor air quality practices in office buildings.

• Motivate Americans to improve their home’s indoor air quality.

So it appears clear that the Obama Administration & the EPA are using regulation through the Clean Air & Clean Water Acts to circumvent a non-existent Cap & Trade legislation. 

By voting against the Cap & Trade legislation in the House earlier this year because it did not go far enough, Congressman Dennis Kucinich, by having the EPA impose big government & economically unsound environmental edicts to push his progressive agenda that has continually failed N/E Ohio.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is awarding 17 cooperative agreements to nonprofit organizations and a university totaling approximately $2.4 million to improve indoor air quality nationwide. Americans spend about 90 percent of their time indoors where levels of air pollution may be two to five times higher than outdoor levels. Indoor air pollutants, such as dust mites, can trigger asthma attacks and radon can cause lung cancer.

Leading Economists Give Industry Reports on EPA an Incomplete, D, two Fs

The economic impact of current policies for the American Destruction Agency, more commonly known as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), have been reviewed & graded by leading economists.

 

The conclusion? EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson should be riding the Short Bus!

From the National Resources Defense Council --

WASHINGTON  (October 28, 2010) -- Recent industry reports purporting to evaluate the economic impacts of policies to keep America’s air clean received unsatisfactory grades from leading economists. Economists from Dartmouth, the University of Wyoming and the University of California at Santa Barbara gave reports from the Manufacturers’ Alliance, IHS Global Insight and Fisher International an Incomplete, D and F respectively.

“These industry groups are attempting to shape vital public health policies with work that wouldn't pass muster in a college economics class,” said John Walke, senior attorney and director of NRDC’s Clean Air Program. “Industry lobbyists are resorting to shoddy economics and outright deception to block EPA rules that could reduce toxic air pollution from industrial plants and save nearly 5,000 lives a year and prevent thousands of cases of respiratory and heart disease. These lobbyists are going further and opposing more protective national smog standards that could save up to 12,000 lives each year.”

For the full reviews go to: http://docs.nrdc.org/legislation/files/leg_10102801a.pdf

Here are excerpts of the reviews from the economists grading these reports:

“Economic Implications of EPA’s Proposed Ozone Standard” - by Manufacturers’ Alliance (MAPI)
Evaluator: Richard B. Howarth, the Pat and John Rosenwald Professor in the Environmental Studies Program at Dartmouth College

Letter Grade -- Incomplete

“The MAPI report is fundamentally flawed, resting on an analytical framework that is scientifically unsound and inappropriate for use in policy evaluation.”

“The report fails to apply standard statistical techniques that are taught to students specializing in the fields of statistics and econometrics.”

“The report would warrant a grade of ‘incomplete’ if it were submitted as an undergraduate honors thesis or master’s thesis in an academic program focusing on environmental policy analysis.”

Evaluation of the Economic Impact of Proposed EPA Air Toxics Rule on Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters – by IHS Global Insight
Evaluator: Jason F. Shogren, Professor, Department of Economics and Finance, University of Wyoming

Letter Grades -- D & F
Application -- D
“Lack of a serious accounting of economic behavior -- no attempt to account for the behavioral elasticities of demand, a high end cost estimation, one-to-one mapping of upgrade costs to demand reduction, not addressing impacts in non-sector gainers within the economy, no accounting for R&D and new technology innovations and entrepreneurship.”

Transparency -- F

“Weak discussion on the basic economic role of responsiveness and substitution possibilities, multiplier justification is unclear, abatement cost assumptions incomplete, unclear, and inadequately justified.”

“Economic Impact of Pending Air Regulations on the US Pulp and Paper Industry,” addressing EPA’s air toxics standards for industrial boilers, by Fisher International

Evaluator -Charles D. Kolstad, PhD, Professor and Chair, Department of Economics,
University of California at Santa Barbara

Letter Grade -- F

“If I were grading this, I would give it an F. The economics is all wrong (lack of an incidence analysis or acknowledgement of its importance; failure to draw on the relevant literature), which of course would be my main concern.”

“But the paper has some redeeming features -- the English grammar is decent and typically better than I see on a poor paper. Furthermore, I would want to encourage the student to work harder on the next assignment.”

For more on the EPA click here.