Image credit: ventura632.wordpress.com
A core Tea Party value is "free markets." Walter E. Williams and Thomas Sowell are two economists who
are able to make complicated subjects accessible to Everyman. In his column today, Mr. Williams explains why capitalism is not a zero-sum game:
Some Americans have much higher
income and wealth than others. Former President Barack Obama explained, "I
do think at a certain point you've made enough money." An adviser to Rep.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez who has a Twitter account called "Every
Billionaire Is A Policy Failure" tweeted, "My goal for this year is
to get a moderator to ask 'Is it morally appropriate for anyone to be a
billionaire?'" Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Elizabeth Warren, in
calling for a wealth tax, complained, "The rich and powerful are taking so
much for themselves and leaving so little for everyone else."
These people would have an argument
if there were piles of money on the ground called income, with billionaires and
millionaires surreptitiously getting to those piles first and taking their
unfair shares. In that case, corrective public policy would require a
redistribution of the income, wherein the ill-gotten gains of the few would be
taken and returned to their rightful owners. The same could be said if there
were a dealer of dollars who — because of his being a racist, sexist,
multi-nationalist and maybe a Republican — didn't deal the dollars fairly. If he
dealt millions to some and mere crumbs to others, decent public policy would
demand a re-dealing of the dollars, or what some call income redistribution.
. . .
A system that requires that one
serve his fellow man to have a claim on what he produces is far more moral than
a system without such a requirement. For example, Congress can tell me,
"Williams, you don't have to get out in that hot sun to mow a lawn to have
a claim on what your fellow man produces. Just vote for me, and through the tax
code, I will take some of what your fellow man produces and give it to
you."
Let's look at a few
multibillionaires to see whether they have served their fellow man well. Bill
Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, with a net worth over $90 billion, is the
second-richest person in the world. He didn't acquire that wealth through
violence. Millions of people around the world voluntarily plunked down money to
buy Microsoft products. That explains the great wealth of people such as Gates.
They discovered what their fellow man wanted and didn't have, and they found
out ways to effectively produce it. Their fellow man voluntarily gave them
dollars. If Gates and others had followed President Obama's advice that
"at a certain point" they'd "made enough money" and shut
down their companies when they had earned their first billion or two, mankind
wouldn't have most of the technological development we enjoy today.
. . .
The only people who benefit from
class warfare are politicians and the elite; they get our money and control our
lives.
Say what you like about Bill Gates; Mr. Williams has a point. The full article is here.
# # #
