Sunday, August 2, 2020
Dragon splashdown
Thursday, July 30, 2020
Action Alert for Ohio
The good news headline:
Ohio pharmacy board backs off hydroxychloroquine ban
at Gov. Mike DeWine’s urging
The bad news headline:
Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine proposes banning liquor sales
after 10 p.m. to stop coronavirus spread in bars
This is one smart virus that knows how to spread itself around more after 10pm.
In our neighborhood, at least half the restaurants have not re-opened since the lock-downs and the riots, and those that have opened are under onerous orders to enforce masks, distancing, etc.; three citations and they get closed down for good. And now comes this latest regulation to further cripple the restaurant and bar businesses.
The Ohio Liquor Control Commission is slated to hold a hearing on the rule 9 a.m. Friday. If approved, DeWine said he would sign an order that would go into effect Friday night.
Contact Gov. Mike DeWine: (614) 644-4357 or by email
Please share with your friends.
# # #
Wednesday, July 29, 2020
Heather Mac Donald on crime, race and policing

John Hinderaker at PowerLine announces an event with Heather
Mac Donald tomorrow Jul-30 at noon central / 1 pm EST.
I’ll post the link (probably later tomorrow) that will let you watch and listen
at your leisure.
AMERICA’S TOP EXPERT DEFENDS THE
POLICE
Thursday, day after tomorrow, at
Noon Central, Heather Mac Donald, the nation’s premier expert on the
intersection of crime, race and policing, will deliver the definitive smackdown
of the anti-police myths that not just liberals, but corporate America, sports
teams, and many Republicans have bought into. The truth is that there is no
“systemic” racism in American policing. Heather’s data-rich presentation will
make that clear.
How do I know that Heather will lay
waste to the mythology of the Left? I’ve seen the script. The data are
overwhelming. Contrary to popular belief, blacks are not “over-represented” in
“police shootings,” the vast majority of which are praiseworthy. On the
contrary, using crime data as the guide, they are under-represented.
There is much more, which you won’t
want to miss. To see our event live, go here to
register. The event is free. Registration means you will get email reminders,
but anyone can watch the event live on American Experiment’s YouTube channel or Facebook page,
and it will be archived for a long to come on YouTube, Facebook, the American Experiment site, and
more.
Hope to see you on Thursday. It
should be a dynamite event.
The true cost of the Wuhan flu scam

A reader (signing on as Nordic Prince) posted the comment
below at Legal Insurrection’s William Jacobson’s posting about Prof. Mike Adams
untimely death:
nordic_prince | July
27, 2020 at 6:36 pm
THIS is the true cost of the Wuhan
flu scam… broken, devastated lives in the wake of the shutdown nonsense and
subsequent economic destruction.
Then we have all these ninnies
running around parroting claptrap like “we’re all in this together,” “if it
saves just one life,” “you can rebuild an economy but you can’t rebuild a
life.” Yeah, tell that to the guy who lost his job, lost his business, lost his
life savings, and now has nothing to leave for his kids except ever mounting
piles of debt. Ever try to get a new career or even a new job when you’re
middle aged, let alone closer to what should be retirement? You’re not only
competing against all the young bucks who look down at you because they think
you’re a dinosaur, you’re also competing with all the other middle-aged guys
who got pink slipped as well. Is it any wonder that suicide and substance abuse
are on the rise?
These people who have brought this
about are pure evil. They hate not only Trump, but they hate us as well. They
don’t give a damn about “the little guy,” and instead treat us worse than the
dog**** you’d scrape off your shoe. They fiddle while America burns, content to
gorge themselves on premium ice cream from a well-stocked commercial grade
freezer while “the little guy” goes to food banks to try and get by.
Prof. Mike Adams was one of the good guys. A tragic end.
In case you didn’t follow this one, Mark Steyn’s column sums it up. And Steyn would know about the silent majority.
# # #
Tuesday, July 28, 2020
Monday, July 27, 2020
Another misnomer: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Stanley Kurtz was the investigative reporter who went to Chicago during the 2008 election cycle to uncover the records from the now-defunct Annenberg Challenge, a foundation that funneled funds to far left educational programs and institutions. It was noteworthy because future President Barack Obama and the terrorist Bill Ayers both sat on the board.
Last night, Mark Levin interviewed Stanley Kurtz on his
hour-long Life, Liberty, and Levin. Mr. Kurtz has turned his attention to the Affirmatively
Furthering Fair Housing legislation, and this innocuous-sounding piece of
legislation is, in fact, one of the biggest threats to our way of
life. Candidate Joe Biden is all for
it. The link for Mr. Levin’s broadcast web
page is here (video page here), and if you have difficulty with access, here are a few paragraphs
from Mr. Kurtz’s essay "Biden and Dems Are Set to Abolish the Suburbs" on line (at the Ethics and Public Policy Center):
. . . Biden has actually promised
to go much further than AFFH [Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing]. Biden has
embraced Cory Booker’s strategy for ending single-family zoning in the suburbs
and creating what you might call “little downtowns” in the suburbs. Combine the
Obama-Biden administration’s radical AFFH regulation with Booker’s new
strategy, and I don’t see how the suburbs can retain their ability to govern
themselves. It will mean the end of local control, the end of a style of living
that many people prefer to the city, and therefore the end of meaningful choice
in how Americans can live. Shouldn’t voters know that this is what’s at stake
in the election?
It is no exaggeration to say that
progressive urbanists have long dreamed of abolishing
the suburbs. (In fact, I’ve explained it all in a book.)
Initially, these anti-suburban radicals wanted large cities to simply annex
their surrounding suburbs, like cities did in the 19th century. That way a big
city could fatten up its tax base. Once progressives discovered it had since
become illegal for a city to annex its surrounding suburbs without voter
consent, they cooked up a strategy that would amount to the same thing.
This de facto annexation strategy had
three parts: (1) use a kind of quota system to force “economic integration” on
the suburbs, pushing urban residents outside of the city; (2) close down
suburban growth by regulating development, restricting automobile use, and
limiting highway growth and repair, thus forcing would-be suburbanites back to
the city; (3) use state and federal laws to force suburbs to redistribute tax
revenue to poorer cities in their greater metropolitan region. If you force
urbanites into suburbs, force suburbanites back into cities, and redistribute
suburban tax revenue, then presto! You have effectively abolished the suburbs.
Read the rest here.
Related: Mr. Kurtz’s
article “Suburbs Hold Key to 2020 Presidential Choice” is here.
This is a subject of concern to every friend, associate, or
family member who lives in the suburbs. This is an excellent topic to share
with them.
# # #
Sunday, July 26, 2020
John Solomon on voter fraud
Many news media, political
activists and social media giants have gotten on the bandwagon that voter fraud
is fiction. It is not.
A review of court cases and recent
indictments – including one this week in Philadelphia against a former
congressman – finds there have been at least four dozen cases in criminal and
civil court since the last presidential election in 2016 in which voter fraud
has led to charges, convictions, lawsuits or plea deals.
The schemes have ranged from old
fashion ballot box stuffing to absentee and mail-in ballot fraud.
Here are a dozen of the more
egregious examples.
. . .
Click here to scroll through those dozen cases
(Philadelphia, Alabama, New Jersey, California, Illinois, etc).






