By Michael P. Ramirez at Townhall:
# # #
Kristina Wong reports on Secy. Pompeo's optimistic take at Breitbart:
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on
Tuesday said he expects there to be a second Trump administration when the
outcome of the election is final.
A reporter asked Pompeo if the
State Department was preparing to engage with the Biden transition team and
whether not doing so would delay or hamper a “smooth transition” or pose a
national security risk.
Pompeo responded: “There will be a
smooth transition to a second Trump administration.”
Cue: splodey heads.
Read the rest here.
# # #
The Liberty Daily links to Real Clear Politics’ map (as of Nov. 11) indicating the Electoral College results. The headline/link: “Real Clear Politics Quietly Moves Georgia Away From Biden — and Below 270 — to Undecided”. Notice that Pennsylvania is also gray. (Note: image will be updated automatically).
# # #
We were in a Sportsbar over the weekend, and the TV screen dialed to CNN had a headline on the crawl to the effect that Joe Biden is declared President. Huh? Since when does the media declare the winner of a Presidential election? Later on Saturday evening, Greg Gutfield opened his show by making jokes about what a Biden presidency would do. So he was framing the question in terms of a probable Biden Presidency – as in a done deal. Nuts. To frame the questions that way is to give up on Trump’s re-election, to fall victim to the media propaganda to take the air out of our tires, so to speak. We changed channels.
On Sunday, many bloggers and commentators enumerated the
procedural steps involved in a contested election. We all know that the respective Secretaries
of State have first to certify the vote counts.
Some of those SOSs may be reluctant to certify tallies they know to be
fraudulent. So that’s one potential check on the
process.
Clarice Feldman at American Thinker has more and is, as
usual, one of the best:
Apparently, they are under the
impression that [the media] decide election results. They don’t. On December
14, electors chosen by state legislators cast their votes. No one else but the
state legislators have that right. (Article II, Sec. 1,§2 of the
Constitution). Certainly not the press, nor state boards of elections,
secretaries of state, governors, or courts.
If they have reason to believe the
elections in their states were unlawfully conducted and the results fraudulent,
they can act to override them. (You can see a detailed history of this section
of the Constitution in this
fine article by Daniel Horowitz.) The Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia,
and Pennsylvania legislatures are majority Republican. At first glance
these states -- particularly the precincts in Milwaukee, Detroit, Pittsburgh,
and Philadelphia -- are the most suspect.
Is there ample evidence of fraud
sufficient to have altered the will of the legal voters in these states? It
sure looks that way.
. . .
If the [Pennsylvania Supreme Court] Court had applied the Constitution, then we wouldn’t have this mess, for it’s clear under Article 1 Sec. 4, cl 1--that the Pennsylvania court had no constitutional power to change the “times, methods, and procedures of elections.”
That provision specifically applies to the election of
senators and representatives, both of whom were on the ballots in question. And what if there is no clear winner by
Inauguration Day? We’ve been reading a
lot about how Mm Pelosi would become President, as the Speaker of the House is
third in the line of succession, But Ms.
Feldman again explains:
What if There’s no Winner Declared by Inauguration Day?
I’ve seen lots of assertions that
in such a case Nancy Pelosi will be the interim president. Nope. Should that
eventuality occur, the House votes for an interim president and the Senate for
an interim vice president. (The House votes are by state -- one vote each --
and the Republicans hold a majority of 26 states. Our founders were geniuses.
Never forget that.)
As Ms. Feldman
closes: “Never give up the good fight.
Never hamstring your will to fight on with pessimism.”
Her article is
here.
# # #
Ned Ryun has some good points about the election chaos we are witnessing. Still, I hope some of his predictions don’t actually happen. From his article at American Greatness:
The frightening part of what is
happening is that regardless of who eventually wins, half the country will
think the other side stole the election. It undermines the legitimacy of
whomever takes the oath of office in January. There’s no avoiding that now. And
that is a devastating place to be in for us as a country. It undermines the
integrity of the process and causes us to lose trust in institutions that we
already barely believed in. If you thought we were fraying at the edges
already, try half the country looking upon the other half as usurpers.
What has happened in our country is
that partisan public officials have, for short term gain, illegally changed the
rules in the middle of the game, outside of the legislative process, and in so
doing annihilated the democratic process and the integrity of the electoral
vote. What does this mean for us as a people? Nothing good.
Republics are in serious trouble
when politicians break laws behind closed doors with impunity. But republics
are over, however, when those laws are actually broken out in the open for
everyone to see and there are no consequences.
History tells us that at some point
if a country cannot settle its differences like civilized people at the ballot
box in a system they trust, they stop talking with ballots and start
communicating with bullets.
Mr. Ryun’s full article is here.
# # #
It's short notice, but if you know anyone in the greater Columbus area who can go, or if you can make it down there yourself, here's the announcement via The Liberty Daily:
Roger L. Simon’s “ The Disastrous 2020 Election Will Never
Be Resolved” is behind a paywall at The Epoch Times, but Instapundit has posted this extract:
It all began with mail-in
voting—that scandal-ready procedure that was the electoral equivalent of flying
over American states in B-52s as if they were behind enemy lines and dropping
ballots at random.
If one were to design a system by
which a democracy could be subverted, even destroyed, universal mail-in voting
(not, of course, normal absentee voting that requires the citizen to request a
ballot) would be at or near the top of a list.
What could go wrong?
It’s not just the obvious—dead
people voting, people who left the state voting, illegal aliens voting,
signatures no one could possibly recognize being authenticated, signatures with
no record, envelopes being back-dated, ballots found in gullies, ballots dumped
in gullies, ballot harvesting, foreign agents voting surreptitiously en masse,
deadlines that keep moving like the proverbial goal posts, and who knows what.
It’s an actual guarantee of
chaos—and that’s what we had and have.
No one will ever really know what
happened.
The pandemic was the excuse, but I
strongly suspect it was more than that. I suspect, in fact I’m sure, that the
intention of some was to utilize the pandemic to institute mail-in voting
because they knew it would create this chaos, almost like an Antifa for the
electoral system.
How do we know it was in some ways
intentional?
There was plenty of warning. Just
this June, 223,000 ballots in Nevada’s Clark County—17 percent of that county’s
electorate that includes Las Vegas—were sent willy-nilly to the wrong addresses
for their primary, according to the Public Interest Legal Foundation.
No evidence has been forthcoming
that this was corrected. PILF president and general legal counsel J. Christian
Adams calls mail-in voting “chaos that lends itself to fraud.”
PILF has posted a rather droll
video—if it weren’t so depressing—of their investigators going to some of these
registration addresses that turn out to be commercial businesses, not homes,
where the putative voter may or may not have once been employed (in some cases
no one seems to have heard of them). These include an abandoned mine, of all
things.
If you have access to The Epoch Times, the full article is here.
# # #