Photo credit: allenbwest.com
Over the past several weeks, several commentators have been analyzing the prospects for a November election
decided by fraud. The potential for fraud and a stolen election this year is yuge, and one of the first articles that
caught my eye was at American Thinker. Here’s an excerpt from Paul Murphy’s July
19 column, “How Democrats Steal Elections”:
The reality is
that in the 2016 election it now takes more than a majority for a Republican to
win. Romney, for example, won about two thirds of all precincts nationwide and
probably got in the range of 55% of the verifiable vote, but lost the election
to nearly unanimous Obama support from nearly
100% turnout of potentially eligible voters in inner city precincts in key
states like Ohio, where the certainty of being accused of racism for even
thinking you couldn't get that level of turnout for a week of free pizza and
beer prevented any form of verification.
Electoral
cheating has probably existed since the second election ever held, but cheating
by American Democrats has now reached
levels never seen before in a major democracy. Basically what seems to have
happened to electoral integrity is akin to the fate of the legendary frog in
water slowly brought to a boil with conservatives only marginally aware that
a a
lot of small battles are being lost and the Democrats relentlessly
pursuing four closely linked, long term, and deeply dishonorable, national
policies:
Democrats hide
the extent of fraud by combining a line of patter denying the existence of
voter fraud while accusing Republicans of it with media blitzes publicizing and
denigrating isolated, and often not very credible,
claims like those that some voting machine somewhere mis-recorded a
few conservative votes as liberal.
This is
stagecraft 101 for magicians and propagandists alike: focusing audience
attention on the insignificance of the occasional process failure in elections
where millions of votes are counted while simultaneously raising emotional and
credibility barriers against those who might otherwise get people to look a bit
more carefully at what other members of the Democrat team are doing.
. . .
The
Secretary of State Project, (apparently originally funded by George
Soros) which seeks to put Democrats in charge of both the voting, and the vote
counting, processes has now succeeded to the point that a majority of American
voters are affected.
Key strategies
implemented by these apparatchiks include:
Fighting the
use of voter id and/or voter list verification though any means possible
including slow walking legislated implementations, lawfare, inviting federal
intrusion into state matters, and directing state and local authority funds
aimed at remediation toward the acquisition and use of dysfunctional
technologies with long histories of delay, uncontrolled cost escalation, and
eventual failure;
Developing and
perpetuating utterly ineffective processes for delivering or counting military
ballots (which tend to favor Republicans);
Refusing to
reform equally incompetent and ineffective processes for preventing felons,
illegals, or the dead (all of whom tend to vote Democrat) from swaying
elections; and,
Extending the
duration of, while weakening eligibility and verification criteria for, all
forms of advance voting.
Using
litigation, and the threat of litigation, to sway electoral process decisions
in favor of Democrats and against Republicans.
. . .
In particular
abuse of the Help America
Vote Act (2002) has enabled Democrats to insert significant new opportunities
for voting fraud into the system.
. . .
Read the rest of Murphy’s column here.
More blogs on this subject coming soon.
# # #
