# # #
Tuesday, November 22, 2016
Thursday, November 17, 2016
Culture wars, Uniparty, and Deep Values research
artwork from Conservative Treehouse
A
few days after the election, the William A. Jacobson (Legal Insurrection blog) interviewed "Deep Values" researcher
Anne Sorock, since she predicted a Trump candidacy and a Trump win before he
even rode down the escalator. Her comments intersect in many places with the
Conservative Treehouse’s ongoing exposure of “the Uniparty” and why Trump’s
candidacy was an alternative. He was unique in offering the potential to destroy the unholy alliances between the donor class, the political
class, and corporate media. Some extracts from the interview
appear below:
WAJ [William A. Jacobson]: When I asked you who you supported at CPAC
2015, what made you not just respond, “Trump,” but insist upon it when no one
else thought he would run much less win?
Anne: I remember that day we
spoke at CPAC. The giddy atmosphere of insiders and wannabe-insiders was
almost ominous. I had been working at The Frontier Lab on mapping disaffiliation by
conservatives from using the term “Republican” to describe themselves.
These conservatives had had enough after 2012, being told to get in line and
vote for Romney, and then the RNC
Autopsy report came out basically as a rubber stamp to keep pursuing
the same tired strategies.
Those aware of the Autopsy felt
it simply confirmed what the Romney debacle had already shown them – that the
GOP and its parasites were incapable of reforming themselves. The only answer
was an outsider to blow it all up.
. . .
At the time, I was following
these threads about conservatism:
The desire for a concrete
way to demonstrate the action of “standing up for your beliefs”
Concern that they had been
enabling “bad behavior” of the GOP in the same way that a parent enables a
child. A taste of empowerment that had
come from interaction with the Tea Party movement, but yearning for more.
WAJ: What about
this outsider aspect?
Anne: That was the functional
part — being an outsider would allow him to do what previous candidates, and
all candidates being considered, were incapable of. And that was absolutely
reject the king-makers at CPAC and in DC in general.
There was so much anger I had
been cataloging at those in charge. There was a seething sense of
being disrespected by those in charge. One of the insights from my research at
the time was that when people were asked to “choose the lesser of two evils,”
they were basically dropping like flies from the Republican label. They might
vote that way, but they resented it even more each time. They were looking for
an anti-hero.
. . .
WAJ: So why didn’t all the
others predict Trump, especially in the consultant/market research community?
Anne: Polling about the
economy, jobs, national security, etc., might reveal superficial insights, even
move the needle a few important points, but it failed in one major respect.
They were asking about issues that are, at best, the outgrowths of their deeper
concerns, but not explanatory or helpful in making predictions. What you don’t
know about, you can’t ask about.
WAJ: What should we understand
about the Americans who supported Trump that we still continue to miss?
Anne: They may care about all
these conservative issues too, but they recognize that the enemy is within the
gates. Our culture is what’s being eroded. Small government may be the
mechanism to restore much of our country’s greatness but it isn’t the emotion,
the value, that drives our country’s unique role in the world.
Read
the rest here.
# # #
Tuesday, November 15, 2016
Trump's 10-Point Immigration Priority Plan
Image via Twitter
Trump Unveils 10-Point
Immigration Priority Plan
President-elect Donald Trump
made immigration a core component of his campaign for the White House. Despite
winning the election [then] just two days ago, his transition team has already
released a 10-point plan to “restore integrity to our immigration system,
protect our communities, and put America first”:
- Build a Wall on the Southern Border
- End Catch-and-Release
- Zero Tolerance for Criminal Aliens
- Block Funding for Sanctuary Cities
- Cancel Unconstitutional Executive Orders & Enforce All Immigration Laws
- Suspend the Issuance of Visas to Any Place Where Adequate Screening Cannot Occur
- Ensure that Other Countries Take Their People Back When We Order Them Deported
- Finally Complete the Biometric Entry-Exit Visa Tracking System
- Turn Off the Jobs and Benefits Magnet
- Reform Legal immigration to Serve the Best Interests of America and its Workers
It's a start.
# # #
Monday, November 14, 2016
Sunday, November 13, 2016
Rent-a-Mobs once again
photo credit: flushyoutube
Peter Hasson at The Daily Caller reports:
Anti-Trump
Protests Funded By Left-Wing ‘Charity’
The Progress Unity Fund is a
tax-exempt 501(c)3 organization — the same classification as the Red Cross. The
group’s mission is to “provide a progressive alternative to mainstream
charities,” according to its IRS filings.
The fund provides the financial backing for Act Now To Stop
War & End Racism (ANSWER) Coalition, a left-wing activist group that
began organizing “emergency protests” immediately after Trump’s
election.
John Perazzo at Front Page Magazine sums it up:
Contrary to media
misrepresentations, many of the supposedly spontaneous, organic, anti-Trump
protests we have witnessed in cities from coast to coast were in fact carefully
planned and orchestrated, in advance, by a pro-Communist organization called
the ANSWER Coalition, which draws its name from the acronym for “Act Now to
Stop War and End Racism.”
. . .
In short, the anti-Trump
protests that are currently making headlines are 100% contrived, fake, phony
exhibitions of street theater, orchestrated entirely by radicals and
revolutionaries whose chief objective is to push America ever farther to the
political left. Moreover, they seek to utterly demoralize conservatives into
believing that public opposition to their own (conservative) political and
social values is growing more powerful, more passionate, and more widespread
with each passing day.
The bottom line is this: The
leaders and organizers of the anti-Trump protests that are currently making so
much noise in cities across America, are faithfully following the blueprint of
Hillary Clinton's famous mentor, Saul
Alinsky, who urged radical activists to periodically stage loud, defiant,
massive protest rallies expressing rage and discontent. Such demonstrations are
designed to give onlookers the impression that a mass movement is preparing to
shift into high gear, and that its present size is but a fraction of what it
eventually will become. A “mass impression,” said Alinsky, can be lasting and
intimidating: “Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you
have.... The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”
And that is precisely what we
are witnessing at the moment.
Rent-a-Mobs
once again.
Saturday, November 12, 2016
Liberal riots and the Trump victory
Dionne Alexander on YouTube
This short video by Dionne Alexander is making the rounds on Facebook, and I LOVED it. I hope you will,
too. (I posted this yesterday but found that only FB subscribers could access
it, so I suspended it. Now it’s up on YouTube.)
# # #
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)