# # #
Friday, November 3, 2017
Wednesday, November 1, 2017
Steve Salvi on the jihad attack in New York City
photo credit: via Jihad Watch
Steve
Salvi is the Founder of the Ohio Jobs & Justice PAC (OJJPAC). He posted the
following on his FB page after the ISIS attack in New York City yesterday:
Why
is it surprising to people that we have terrorists in the US killing people? We
have hundreds of cities run by Socialist Democrat Progressives who have
instituted "sanctuary policies" for illegal aliens"and refuse to
turn in criminal illegal aliens until they kill our citizens nor prosecute
those legal immigrants or citizens who aid and abet their legal presence and
plots.
We
have inept visa programs, including the visa lottery program, which allow
terrorists to legally enter the US to attack us, and tens of thousands of
unvetted Muslim refugees (selected by people at the UN who include
anti-American nationals) and allowed to enter the US during the Obama
administration.
When
Pres. Trump attempts to keep terrorists from traveling to the US, what do
Clinton and or Obama appointed judges do? They block Trump's orders by
supporting lawsuits filed by their partisan Democratic State Atty. Generals and
or its political coalition group allies.
In another post, he mentions that the jihad suspect once lived in Cuyahoga Falls. Steve’s
website is here.
Robert Spencer has several posts on his website Jihad Watch. Here's one of several posted there today; the photo at the top is from the linked report.
# # #
Tuesday, October 31, 2017
Happy Halloween
photo credit via Conservative Treehouse
Happy Halloween
from Cleveland Tea Party
Watch some of the 27 minute video ("President Trump and The First Lady Participate in Halloween at the White House") on YouTube here. Good fun.
# # #
Monday, October 30, 2017
The Manafort indictment
art credit: thecontrarianmedia.com
What’s the deal with the Manafort and Gates indictments? Is this the beginning of the end of Trump’s Presidency? Has Mueller found all those colluding Russians, Russians, Russians?
Even from Paul Manafort’s perspective, there may be less to this
indictment than meets the eye — it’s not so much a serious allegation of
“conspiracy against the United States” as a dubious case of disclosure
violations and money movement that would never have been brought had he not
drawn attention to himself by temporarily joining the Trump campaign.
From President Trump’s perspective, the indictment is a boon from
which he can claim that the special counsel has no actionable collusion case.
It appears to reaffirm former FBI director James Comey’s multiple assurances
that Trump is not a suspect. And, to the extent it looks like an attempt to
play prosecutorial hardball with Manafort, the president can continue to
portray himself as the victim of a witch hunt.
McCarthy’s article at National
Review is here.
# # #
Sunday, October 29, 2017
Gov. Kasich: do you mean legal or illegal immigration?
art credit: beforeitsnews.com
Breitbart reports on Gov. Kasich’s appearance
on Fox News Sunday (warning: GOPe Weasel Words Alert):
.
. . Gov. John Kasich (R-OH) said the “bulk” of the Republican party was
pro-immigration and not moving towards nationalism.
Kasich
said, “I think the bulk of the Republican Party — and I’ve been in the party
since I was a college student — it’s one that believes in the fact that America
has a place in the world, Reagan talked about it, it advances humanity. I
agree. I think the bulk of the Republican Party does believe that immigration
provides energy to our country.”
He
continued, “I think the bulk of the Republican party believes that America is
special and has a place in the world to advance freedom and free enterprise and
all those things. I think that this move towards nationalism where we are
looking inward, has a lot of loud voices but I don’t think it’s the bulk.”
Speak for yourself, Gov. Kasich. You are not
speaking for Americans who support LEGAL immigration, not ILLEGAL immigration
or amnesty.
#
# #
Labels:
Amnesty,
Gov. Kasich,
Illegal immigration,
legal immigration
Thursday, October 26, 2017
IRS “apologizes” for targeting Tea Party and liberty groups
cartoon credit: Christopher Weyant [The Hill] via Pinterest
The media is reporting that the lawsuits
filed against the IRS by various Tea Party and liberty organizations have been
settled. This extract is from the report in The Washington Post:
The
Justice Department has reached settlement agreements with groups that alleged
their constitutional rights were violated when their applications for
tax-exempt status received extra scrutiny because their names contained words
such as “tea party” or “patriots,” court filings show.
In
one agreement, which still must be approved by a judge, the Internal Revenue
Service admitted that its treatment of the organizations was “wrong” and
expressed a “sincere apology” for what happened.
.
. .
The
targeting of tea party organizations that applied for tax-exempt status was a
major controversy of the Obama administration, as hundreds of
conservative-leaning groups received scrutiny. In some cases, it delayed the
processing of applications for years.
Many
felt the conduct was an example of the president punishing his political
enemies.
.
. .
The
Justice Department, too, conducted a criminal investigation but ultimately
decided not to bring charges, including against Lois Lerner, the IRS official
who oversaw tax-exempt groups.
“Our
investigation uncovered substantial evidence of mismanagement, poor judgment
and institutional inertia, leading to the belief by many tax-exempt applicants
that the IRS targeted them based on their political viewpoints,” Assistant
Attorney General for Legislative Affairs Peter J. Kadzik wrote in 2015.
“But
poor management is not a crime,” Kadzik wrote. “We found no evidence that any
IRS official acted on political, discriminatory, corrupt, or other
inappropriate motives that would support a criminal prosecution.”
"Poor management"? Weaponizing the IRS is “poor
management”? And of course, nobody is going to jail, losing their job, or
losing their pension. Read the rest of the WaPo story here. There’s also a
report at cleveland.com.
UPDATE at 6:21pm from Rick Moran at American Thinker blog:
The settlement, as
unsatisfactory to many as it is, at least closes the book on this sordid
chapter in the history of the IRS. Will it curtail the IRS from using
politics to enforce tax law again? Since no one was punished after
this blatant example of political use of the tax agency, I doubt it.
Full blog post is here.
#
# #
Labels:
cleveland.com,
IRS,
Lois Lerner,
patriots,
Tea Party,
Washington Post
Tuesday, October 24, 2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)