Seen at Patriot Post:
# # #
Ralph King and President Trump
Ohio’s Ralph King: Establishment
Republicans
are Trying to Take over Local GOP
to Help Matt Dolan in Primary
The “Ralph King” in the Breitbart headline is Cleveland Tea
Party founder Ralph King :
Ralph King, the co-founder of
Cleveland Tea Party Patriots, told Breitbart News Saturday that
establishment Republicans with close ties to Democrats are trying to
infiltrate the Republican Party of Cuyahoga County in order to help U.S. Senate
candidate Matt Dolan early in the primary process and wrest control
away from conservatives who have taken command in recent years.
King, who has been active
in Cuyahoga County Republican politics since 2001, explained that
the establishment Republicans are trying to infiltrate the local county
party in an effort to help Dolan in the upcoming 2024 Senate race’s
Republican primary after his failed attempt in 2022 when he came in
third behind now-Sen.
J.D. Vance (R-OH) in the GOP primary.
“The activists and the
conservatives, you know, we’ve been fighting for a long time,” King
acknowledged. “We just stopped a lobbyist from taking over the Ohio Republican
Party. There’s a huge fight between the lobbyists and the conservatives in
the Ohio
House over the Ohio speaker. And in Cuyahoga County, which I’ve been
on for many, many years, you know, we continually fought against the liberals,
the establishment, the donor class, and until recently, we finally got a good
chair to put a stop to all that. And the liberals and the RINOs in the
establishment, you know, they are pushing back. And at this moment, what
they’re trying to do is they’re trying to hold illegal meetings … to try to get
rid of a new chairman that we have [who] has given voice to the members and has
stopped putting their finger on the scale, to tip it towards the establishment,
and they’re mad they no longer control the party.”
“Between [former] President [Donald]
Trump coming out [in support] for J.D. Vance and us on the Cuyahoga County
Republican Party, Matt Dolan tried to steal that endorsement,” King continued.
“Cuyahoga County Republican Party is one of the largest GOP parties in the
state of Ohio. Although we’re in the pit of the Democrat heart of Ohio, we do
have the largest party. It is Matt Dolan’s home party. That’s the importance,
so between President Trump and the Cuyahoga County Republican Party slapping
Matt Dolan down in that last election — between the two — we ultimately killed his chances to win the primaries. That’s why
Matt knows he needs control of the GOP in Cuyahoga County at this point. So
what he did, he’s vowed revenge since that time.”
King ultimately said that the
“illegal meeting” the establishment Republicans are trying to hold for
the Cuyahoga County Republican Party is to remove the current chair, Lisa
Stickan, halfway through her four-year term to put Lee Weingart in as chair
to help Dolan be better placed in the 2024 Republican primary.
“So what [Dolan’s] done is we have
a gentleman by the name of Lee Weingart,” King explained. “Lee Weingart is
a lobbyist. Lee Weingart has a history of donating to [Rep.] Marcy Kaptur
[(D-OH)], [Sen.] Sherrod Brown [(D-OH)], a long history of donating to [former
Rep.] Tim Ryan [(D-OH)] — actually made $3,000 donations to Tim Ryan in 2021
and was actually campaigning for Tim Ryan in Iowa [during his failed
presidential run] — which would be par for the course for Matt Dolan to team up
with a guy and a lobbyist like Lee Weingart. Lee Weingart tried to hold an
illegal meeting. He used Matt Dolan’s firm to give some outrageous legal
opinion supporting this illegal meeting. And what people need to realize is
there’s a key between Matt Dolan and Lee Weingart and the donations to the
Democrats and supporting Democrats. Matt Dolan was originally a Democrat before
he started calling himself a Republican. … We are in a fight for the life of
the Cuyahoga County Republican Party against the establishment likes of Lee
Weingart and Matt Dolan.” . . .
Ralph King: fighting the good fight. Full report is here.
# #
#
In his article "The Sovietization of Medical Care," Jeffrey A. Tucker, President of the Brownstone Institute, compares the failures in the old Soviet Union’s “health care” system to America’s politicization of our healthcare system, using the introduction of the COVID virus as the cudgel:
. . . In the US, in nearly every
state, regardless of whether the virus was spreading rapidly with significant
medical consequences, hospitals were forcibly reserved only for emergencies and
Covid patients. Elective surgeries were out of the question, as were cancer
screenings or other routine checkups. This left most hospitals in the country
with very few patients and a gutting of their profitability models, leading to
furloughs of thousands of nurses during a pandemic.
It also created a situation in
which hospitals were desperate for a revenue source. By government legislation,
a subsidy was provided to them for Covid patients and Covid deaths, thus
incentivizing medical institutions to classify everyone with a positive PCR
test as a Covid case, regardless of what else was wrong with the patient.
This began almost immediately. Here
is Deborah Birx speaking to the issue on April 7, 2020.
[Video clip & tweet:] Here is
Dr. Birx saying that the government is recording anyone who dies with
coronavirus in the United States, regardless of any other health issue, as a
death from coronavirus.
This practice continued for two
years, leading to a massive confusion about how many people actually died of
Covid and skewing all existing data on the case fatality rate. . . .
Further, doctors all over the
country are facing massive pressure to list as many deaths as possible as Covid
deaths.
These programs create a vicious circle. They establish incentives to
overstate the danger of Covid. The overstatement provides a justification to
continue the state of emergency, which keeps the perverse incentives going.
With effective vaccines and treatments widely available, and an infection
fatality rate on par with flu, it’s past time to recognize that Covid is no
longer an emergency requiring special policies.
. . . The further we move away from
health care as essentially a doctor/patient relationship, with freedom of
choice on all sides, and the more we allow central plans to replace on-the-ground
clinical wisdom, the less it looks like quality health care and the less it
contributes to public health.
The full report is here.
Recommended.
The website for Dr Simone Gold’s America’s Frontline Doctors no longer comes up in my online searches. Instead, I find reports advising readers that
these doctors were pushing “misinformation” and prescriptions of ineffective and
harmful medications, such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine (which, in
reality, have been very effective in mitigating COVID symptoms).
Dr Gold was imprisoned for showing up at the January 6 “insurrection”
in DC. ABC described her as a “leading
anti-vax figure.” No, she was/is against
the mandates and the particular mRNA injection.
If you want to see how blatant censorship and political propaganda corrupts
the public discourse, have a look at the Wikipedia page for Dr Gold here. My take-away:
I would not trust Wikipedia on any topic that has generated
controversy.
# # #
The Green New Deal, the New World Order, or by whatever name
you call it – our betters at the World Economic Forum want us to eat bugs instead of meat. John Hinderaker at PowerLine takes it
seriously:
The Left’s two main targets, so
far, are fertilizers and animal husbandry. What is the end game? Leftists want
us to eat a largely vegetarian diet, with insects as a protein source instead
of cows, pigs and poultry.
This is no secret if you follow
leftist writing, but many people find it hard to believe. To be fair, there is
a great deal about modern liberalism that I find hard to believe. But the plan
to convert us all to insect-eaters is real.
Thus this headline: EU Gives Green Light for Use of Two Insect Species in Human Food.
For a deeper dive on how all this is fulfilling the Davos
crowd’s dreams of making us eat insects, here’s part of Itxu Diaz’s column at The American Conservative:
Until now, common sense led us to
unhesitatingly step on any insects we find dragging their bellies across the
kitchen floor. But currently, the masters of the universe are set on correcting
this practice: They prefer you to eat them.
In recent months there has been a
worldwide campaign, especially intense in the European Union, to convince us to
incorporate crickets and worms into our diet. And, as we are not yet crazy
enough to do so, they have found a way to make us do it anyway: by including
them as a substitute for flour and protein in products we consume on a daily
basis.
. . .
It is a battle that can obviously
be won on the street without much effort. I don't know anyone who wants to
leave their children a world where you can only get around by bicycle or, at
best, electric cars, where heating is banned, and at lunchtime you find a salad
with crickets, worms, and fake steaks by Bill Gates waiting for you on your
plate. That is not a world, that is hell.
For centuries, much of the
superiority of Western civilization has been apparent in our food. There is no
need to give our moral decline a seat at the dinner table. Refusing to eat
insects is a show of respect and obedience to our mothers, who, when as babies
we lifted bugs from the ground to our mouths, told us, "Don't eat
that!"
The PowerLine
report is here. The American Conservative
report is here. In our household, we’re
starting to read labels on packaged food even more carefully.
# # #
PowerLine’s "Week In Pictures" published this meme:
Hidden Pictures: can
you spot Sesame Street’s Purple Monster in the meme?
# # #
JD Rucker at The Liberty Daily reports:
The UniParty Swamp scored a major
victory yesterday by reelecting Ronna Romney McDaniel as Republican National
Committee Chairwoman. This comes despite the fact that she has presided over
the last three failed election cycles. Republicans haven’t performed up to
expectations since BEFORE she took office.
So why would the 168-member body
endorse further failure when they had America First patriot Mike Lindell and
legal warrior Harmeet Dhillon as better options? There was one interesting data
point in a survey conducted by the NY Times of the RNC members that points to the likely
reason. According to poll results, “just
four offered an unabashed endorsement of Mr. Trump’s 2024 campaign.”
It’s actually more insidious than that. Harmeet Dhillon is not really a better
option. Here's Sundance at Conservative Treehouse on the continuing Kabuki Theater:
Mike Lindell announced he was going
to challenge Ronna McDaniel for the RNC chair. This sent a shockwave
through the Big Club because the potential for support from President Trump
loomed over the Lindell announcement. America-First Mike Lindell is not
controlled by corporate money, Wall Street, the multinationals or billionaire
Big Donors who ultimately control the RNC as a big private club.
So, what happened?… Facing
the possibility that Ronna McDaniel might be unseated, a week after Lindell’s
announcement, Harmeet Dhillon steps into the picture.
Dhillon is a tenured Big Club
member and voice for the billionaire class who fund her. Remember,
Dhillon was paid over $1 million by the RNC, separate and above any costs
connected to the Trump legal defense fund. Dhillon makes her money
from the RNC, and if Lindell won the chairmanship, in addition to her friend
losing the seat, Dhillon was financially at risk. Dhillon enters the race
as an insurance policy, on behalf of the Big Club donors.
. . .
It’s not organic. All of this
is scripted. All of it. Every bit of it. Harmeet Dhillon is
already part of the DeSantis Big Club operation. The RNC roadmap in 2008
was for John McCain. The RNC roadmap for 2012 was for Mitt Romney.
The RNC roadmap for 2016 was for Jeb Bush, and the RNC, Big Club, Wall
Street, Billionaire and multinational corporate roadmap in 2024 is for Ron
DeSantis. None of this is organic. All of this is scripted.
The RNC raises a lot of money. Whether they win or lose. More at Liberty Daily here and at
Conservative Treehouse here.
JD Rucker concludes:
If you are an America First
patriot, the RNC hates you. They’ll use you for your donations and beg you for
your votes, but in the end they despise everything you represent. You shouldn’t
give them a penny.
# # #
Whether it’s challenges to the claims about “man-made climate change,” the COVID vaxx, or other examples of “misinformation,”
a judge in California has issued an injunction against that state’s attempt to
muzzle and penalize any doctors who disagree with the CDC’s and other
government mandates on COVID (vaxx, masks, etc.). Mark Wauck at Meaning in History reports:
This tactic cleverly relies upon
the common misconception that “science” consists of a body of settled knowledge
that is above challenge, rather than being a process of continuing inquiry that
relies to a great degree precisely upon challenges to previous consensus (I
simplify, of course). This notion of a settled body of knowledge—identified as
such by Leftist ideologues without regard to evidence as such—is then used to shut
down debate on whatever happens to be the latest Leftist pseudo scientific
cause—”settled science” so just shut up! You’re an ignoramus if you dare
object, or if you demand evidence to back up the Left’s latest campaign.
We’ve seen this tactic employed
repeatedly, first in “social science” fields and now even in the “hard”
sciences. Most recently, with the use of the charge of “misinformation—it has
evolved into a full assault of the First Amendment and an instrument of social
control. The Covid Regime, with its numerous scientifically unjustified
mandates—masks, distancing, plexiglass screens, and so forth—has offered
fertile ground for the extension of draconian anti-freedom controls over the
populace. All in the name of an invented and often contradictory “scientific
consensus” which usually boils down to an uninformed and arbitrary bureaucratic
consensus.
. . . Specifically, [Judge William]
Shubb attacks the definition of “misinformation” as something that is contradicted
by a supposed “scientific consensus”—a highly problematic concept.
In an order Wednesday, Shubb
criticized the law’s definition of “misinformation,” which is “false information
contradicted by contemporary scientific consensus contrary to the standard
of care.”
Shubb, who called the
definition “nonsense” at a court hearing Monday, said in Wednesday’s order
that it was “grammatically incoherent.”
Beyond that, Shubb’s order
also criticized the phrase “contemporary scientific consensus,” saying
that it doesn’t have an established meaning in the medical field.
“The statute provides no clarity
on the term’s meaning, leaving open multiple important questions,” the order
said. “For instance, who determines whether a consensus exists to begin
with? If a consensus does exist, among whom must the consensus exist (for
example practicing physicians, or professional organizations, or medical
researchers, or public health officials, or perhaps a combination)?”
That lack of clarity, the judge added,
makes it impossible to determine what the new law prohibits.
“I think he correctly analyzed the
facts and the law and understood that the concept of a ‘contemporary scientific
consensus’ is highly problematic,” said Richard Jaffe, an attorney representing
one of the challenges to the rule.
Mr. Wauck concludes:
Given that the federal
judiciary—right up to the SCOTUS—has largely been missing in action while the
Left has been running roughshod over our constitutionally protected freedoms,
it’s refreshing to see a judge directly challenging these tactics. Hopefully
this case will establish a precedent for dismantling this Leftist assault on
freedom.
Source links
are here and here.
# # #