Posted in observance of the suspension of any Debt Ceiling
# # #
Luis Miguel at The New
American is looking beyond the DC swamp – in order to drain the swamp:
Congress Won’t Drain the Swamp — It’s Up to
the States
No politician at the federal level is
going to drain the swamp, because the federal government is the
swamp.
It’s human nature. No one with
great power is going to strip himself of that power. That’s like expecting
Genghis Khan to step down from the throne. It’s not going to happen.
. . .
The United States began as a
federation of sovereign states unified for mutual defense. But eventually, the
capital they created — Washington, D.C. — became its own political entity and
usurped control over the states that had created it. The state-created federal
government, seated in Washington, D.C., now operates on its own independent of
the states and opposed to their interests.
. . .
Furthermore, Washington is a
city-state in which the ruling dynasty is the globalist cabal. Everything else
is a facade. All the congressmen, senators, bureaucrats, intelligence officers,
and generals who live and work there are servants of the globalist oligarchy,
not representatives of the people. The entire system in D.C. is designed to
protect the interests of the cabal — Congress can’t completely reform it from
within.
“Everything else is a façade”. Again, that fits right in with Sundance’s scenario that all of the DC political construct is a “Potemkin Village”, maintained to provide us plebes with the “Illusion of Choice.” Mr. Miguel concludes:
This is why it is up to the states,
through nullification and an aggressive reasserting of their states’ rights, to
rein in the federal government. For if D.C. is the swamp, then the city must be
drained — and only the states have the power to do it.
Read the full column here.
# # #
Yesterday, pResident Joe Biden took a nasty prat fall at the
US Air Force Academy graduation ceremony.
The short video is at Treehouse
here. But the clip is also up on the Telegram
channel Slavyangrad, a Russian channel (no link; it’s subscribers only).
So the world watches.
Many call Biden’s presidency a case of elder abuse. True, but it’s also tragic and embarrassing to witness America now as a global laughingstock. Matthew G.
Andersson at American Thinker just published a column, “Why the White House Wants War,” and he thinks Biden’s
pResidency is even worse than embarrassing.
Mr. Andersson’s frightening conclusion:
An unsettling aspect of the Biden
administration’s foreign policy is that, while it seeks war, it isn’t prepared
to fight one (especially with a putative civilian commander qualified for 25th
Amendment removal): it invites a confrontation with Russia (and to some extent
with China) not to win, but in an unprecedented perversion of U.S. national
security interests, to lose: it has declared America, Americanism, and a
majority of Americans, as its enemy. It will use Russia as a tool for its
own domestic “transformation” which means the attempted dismantling of U.S.
constitutional law. The White House wants war, but an effective internal civil
war that results in a reconstructed government, legal system, and political
order. Biden was installed not just as an Obama proxy, but as a signal of
weakness. . . .
The full article is here.
# # #
The Freedom Caucus can now re-brand as the RINO Caucus. Politico reports:
Jim Jordan and other key
conservative firebrands have caused a fair share of House Speaker Kevin
McCarthy‘s biggest headaches. But instead of leading the rebellion this time,
they helped him quash it.
As the House Freedom Caucus was
preparing to discuss whether to officially oppose the speaker’s bipartisan debt
deal — a move that would potentially galvanize conservative opposition — Jordan
(R-Ohio) phoned several fellow members with a request, according to a person
familiar with the calls. The former chair of the group urged them to hold back,
effectively giving conservatives who wanted to vote with McCarthy license to do
so.
Jordan, a longtime McCarthy
antagonist turned ally, almost got his wish. The group took no official
position until hours before the vote, when most members had already made up
their minds.
The beloved House Freedom Caucus
co-founder — who gravitated toward McCarthy after the now-speaker tapped him
for a senior spot on the Oversight Committee — helped out in other ways. The
Ohio lawmaker spoke up in favor of the deal in private calls and meetings,
including taking the mic at a closed-door huddle on Tuesday night, just hours
after many of his fellow conservatives had spent the day trashing the deal.
This report concludes with this:
If most Republicans get on board,
it means threats against his speakership won’t gain real traction. And with
two-thirds of the GOP conference backing the deal Wednesday, it seemed to be
working.
“We didn’t do it by taking the easy
route,” McCarthy said in a celebratory post-vote press conference. “It wasn’t
an easy fight, I had people on both sides upset.”
But he added: “I think we did
pretty damn good for the American people.”
No debt ceiling. No
serious budget process. J D Rucker
considers this bill an existential threat.
His take is here.
# # #
Retraction Watch monitors retractions of peer-reviewed articles/research that don’t hold up under scrutiny. It’s utterly damning to see the sheer number of peer-reviewed reports -- on COVID -- retracted – always after the damage is done:
We’ve been tracking retractions of
papers about COVID-19 as part of our database. Here’s a running list:
Retracted
“5G
Technology and induction of coronavirus in skin cells,” published in Biological
Regulators & Homeostatic Agents on July 16, 2020, withdrawn on July 24, 2020.
Our coverage here.
“A
Case Series of Stent Thrombosis During the COVID-19 Pandemic,” published
on May 27, 2020 in JACC: Case Reports; retraction date is
unknown. Retracted as a duplicate publication by journal error.
“A
Comparison of Early Rehabilitation in the Intensive Care Units of Patients With
Severe COVID-19: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis,” published November
10, 2022 in Cureus; retracted on
April 4, 2023.
“A
data-mining based analysis of traditional Chinese medicine in diagnosing and
treating COVID-19,” published on June 24, 2021 in The Anatomical
Record; unknown when retracted.
“A deep
learning model and machine learning methods for the classification of potential
coronavirus treatments on a single human cell,” published on October 17,
2020 in the Journal of Nanoparticle Research; retracted on
August 16, 2021.
“A Discourse
Analysis of Quotidian Expressions of Nationalism during the COVID-19 Pandemic
in Chinese Cyberspace,” published on September 8, 2020; retracted on
April 12, 2022.
“A
mechanistic analysis placental intravascular thrombus formation in COVID-19
patients,” published on April 25, 2020 in Annals of Diagnostic
Pathology. Retracted on June 22, 2020 as a duplicate publication by journal
error.
“A
meta-analysis of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)
antibody treatment for COVID-19 patients,” published on August 20, 2021
in Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease; retracted on
November 21, 2021. See our coverage here.
“A
Model Based Analysis for COVID-19 Pandemic in India: Implications for Health
Systems and Policy for Low- and Middle-Income Countries,” preprint possted
on June 12, 2020 in medRxiv; retracted on
August 18, 2020.
“A
psychosocial exploration of body dissatisfaction: A narrative review With a
focus on India during COVID-19,” published on July 29, 2021 in Frontiers in
Global Women’s Health; retracted on
January 19, 2023.
. . .
The rest of the list is here. (Links via the original article)
RELATED: Ben Bartee at PJ Media: “Peer-Reviewed Study: 'The Higher the Number of Vaccines Previously Received, the Higher the Risk of Contracting COVID-19' “
And American Greatness has more: click here.
# # #
Over the Memorial Day weekend, Sundance at Conservative Treehouse posted a piece on how America suddenly went off the rails, and it’s persuasive. Here’s a big chunk of it:
. . . As some continue to say with
jaw agape, WTF happened?
The answer “why” is not
complicated…. not complicated at all.
In 2008, the ‘activists’ took
control of government.
In January of 2009, the leftists,
community organizers and activists took control of the systems they had opposed
for the preceding 50+ years.
In January of 2009, and inflection
point took place; an inflection point that no one realized in forethought,
scale or consequence.
Starting in 2009, all of the
systems of federal government were now under the control of the people who
previously fought against the systems of federal government. Everything
since is an outcome of that inflection point; that’s why everything flipped.
All of it, and I do mean every
scintilla of the thing; every single granular detail and example you can put in
front of me can be traced back to that moment when the activists were no longer
outside government railing against the corrupt system they hated.
Starting in January of 2009, the
activists took power over the United States government, and every outside
institution, including media, necessarily and ideologically followed that
inversion.
Starting in 2009, the systems and
institutions of the U.S government now came under the control of the radical
activists.
In the eight years that followed,
the mission of every institution was changed. Government was weaponized
on behalf of the leftist activists who now took control of it. Everything
thereafter is a consequence of this change.
When I use the word “suddenly”, it
is only for understanding the inflections point that came as a
consequence. In actuality, the severity of change inside each institution
took place over several years. That’s why the intensity of the weaponized
and corrupt systems became worse over time.
As each institution was infiltrated
to become more aligned with the mindset of the activists, the institutions
became more radical in their targeting and weaponization.
The activists went from being
outside government to being inside government.
Suddenly, the left-wing supportive
media changed mission priority from railing against corrupt government, to
defending the corrupt weaponization of govt.
Suddenly, the FBI went from
targeting domestic threats, to targeting only the domestic threats defined as
against the interests of the left-wing activists.
Suddenly, the outside activists
went from being defined as social elements creating turmoil, to social elements
now being defended and even promoted.
This is why we see outside activist
groups like the Dream Defenders, New Black Panthers, Black Lives Matter, Occupy
Wall Street and more recently ANTIFA, as protected and supported by the
activists inside government now in control of the systems and institutions.
All of the social, cultural and
political dynamics that changed traditional “liberalism” are easily understood
once you realize and accept that activists took control of the power centers of
the U.S. government.
Everything that followed, including
our current state of social and political turmoil, is simply a natural
conclusion of that fundamental change.
The radical activists are now in
control of the institutions of power. This core shift is what created the
dynamic of a very visible two-tiered justice system. Each institution was
weaponized and continues to be weaponized against those who are not aligned
with the activist ideology. . . .
Read the entire piece here.
# # #