Tea Party Patriots Ordinary citizens reclaiming America's founding principles.

Wednesday, March 19, 2014

Cuyahoga County Executive candidates will debate




From Cleveland.com Northeast Ohio Media Group:

CLEVELAND, Ohio – It's official: all six Democratic candidates for Cuyahoga County Executive have committed to appearing at a debate organized by the City Club of Cleveland.
State Rep. Armond Budish, the race's frontrunner, was the final candidate to commit – he did so on Monday, City Club CEO Dan Moulthrop said. The event will take place at noon on April 7, and will be moderated by WVIZ/PBS IdeaStream’s Rick Jackson.

County Councilman Jack Schron, the presumptive Republican candidate for Cuyahoga County Executive, will get his own City Club event on April 2.
. . .
# # #

Saturday, March 15, 2014

Very bad news: USA ceding Internet authority to the UN


Art credit: anunews.com




The US is starting to relinquish its sovereignty. Politico reports:

The U.S. Commerce Department is relinquishing its hold over the group that manages the Internet’s architecture amid pressure to globalize its functions in the wake of reports about NSA surveillance.
The National Telecommunications & Information Administration, a Commerce Department agency, said Friday it is transitioning the function to the “global Internet community.” The decision marks a dramatic change. Since the Internet’s inception, the United States has played a leading role in the management of critical back-end Web work, including management of .com and other domain names. The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) has performed those functions under U.S. Commerce contract since 2000.
. . .
Some U.S. officials have warned about the dangers of ceding ICANN’s authority to the International Telecommunication Union, a United Nations agency, fearing countries like Russia and China could use it to allow online censorship. Congress unanimously passed a resolution ahead of a 2012 ITU meeting, highlighting the U.S. commitment to keeping the Internet free from government control.
Daniel Castro, a senior analyst at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, disputed the connection between NSA revelations and Internet governance in an op-ed Friday, and he warned that ICANN would not be held accountable without U.S. control.
“If the Obama Administration gives away its oversight of the Internet,” he said, “it will be gone forever.”
Some criticism of the decision immediately started popping up on Twitter.
“Every American should worry about Obama giving up control of the internet to an undefined group,” former House Speaker Newt Gingrich tweeted shortly after the announcement. “This is very, very dangerous.”
Read the rest here

Update: Health Care Compact


Art credit: granitegrok.com

An update from Jamie Story Kohlmann, Managing Director, Health Care Compact
. . . the Health Care Compact has gained two more co-sponsors in Congressmen Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma and Tom Graves of Georgia. That's two more members of Congress who agree that states should have the option to manage health care themselves and the freedom to opt out of Obamacare and other failed federal programs.
The latest two signers join our lead sponsor, James Lankford (OK), and existing co-sponsors Rob Bishop (UT), Jeff Duncan (SC), and Lynn Westmoreland (GA), all of whom come from states that have already joined the Compact. These six House members are effectively representing their constituents and state legislatures, which have clearly declared that they want freedom from Obamacare.
We have news from the states too. The Health Care Compact is awaiting a House vote in Ohio, and we're hopeful the bill will soon be filed in North Carolina.
But for now, the main story is in Kansas, where the Compact is on the House Floor awaiting debate and approval. Once through the House it will go to the Senate, which has a freedom-loving majority that will likely pass it quickly. If you or any of your friends live in Kansas, please have them reach out to their state legislators to urge passage of the Health Care Compact next week. 
Finally - if you haven't seen it yet, please check out this National Review Online story from Karen Lugo at the Texas Public Policy Foundation. It's one of the best articles I've seen about the Health Care Compact. Once you've read it, please share with your friends and encourage them to learn more at www.healthcarecompact.org
Remember - the Health Care Compact does not prescribe a solution, but lets each member state design health care solutions that best fit its unique citizens. Just like we don't appreciate the federal government telling states what to do, the Compact doesn't tell member states what to do either. The Compact merely gives states the opportunity to choose health care solutions that are designed closer to home - not in Washington, D.C.

# # #

Friday, March 14, 2014

Follow ObamaCare Delays at Your Peril


Photo credit: wisegeek.com


Anthony Ciani has some good advice at AmericanThinker:

Despite being “the law of the land”, President Obama is telling a lot of people to ignore ObamaCare; but does that absolve you from following it?  The Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as ObamaCare, is now in full effect, or it is supposed to be.  To avert certain political disaster for the Democratic Party, Obama has issued, as of March 5, 2014, 20 unilateral executive actions to “delay” ObamaCare mandates and taxes.
The President has the authority to pardon, but he cannot pre-pardon your crimes, just as a priest cannot pre-absolve your uncommitted sins; and just as a priest cannot change the list of sins, Obama cannot change the taxes you owe or the benefits you must provide.  So what could happen if you follow Obama’s “delays” and “waivers” in lieu of the law?
. . .  One of Obama’s unilateral changes was to allow people to keep their existing, non-qualifying insurance plans, but those who do will still owe the taxes, regardless of what Obama says or leads you to believe.
So what might happen if you keep your insurance and forgo your 2014 ObamaCare tax?  Regardless of reason, whether you believed Obama or were civilly disobedient, you failed to pay your taxes; however, the ObamaCare tax is special.  The IRS can neither criminally prosecute you nor seize your property for refusing to pay the mandate tax, but it can place liens on your property and assess penalties, and the IRS can criminally prosecute you and seize your property for failing to pay the penalties for evading the ObamaCare mandate.

These are potentially serious consequences, so if your 2014 tax preparation software omits the ObamaCare tax, complain to the manufacturer.  Find software or a preparer that includes the tax, or prepare the forms yourself.  If the official IRS forms omit the ObamaCare tax, complain to or sue the IRS, and then figure it out on your own.  Whatever you do, determine if you comply, and pay if you do not.
. . . Only the law is meaningful to the courts; they care nothing about unlawful executive decrees.[emphasis added]


Read more here

Friday, March 7, 2014

Libertarian candidate for governor bounced from primary

Photo credit: ohiocitizen.org

The Plain Dealer online / Cleveland.com is reporting :

Libertarian candidate for governor, Charlie Earl, 
bounced from primary

COLUMBUS, Ohio -- Secretary of State Jon Husted on Friday ruled that signatures on nominating petitions for Libertarian gubernatorial candidate Charlie Earl and his running mate Sherry Clark were invalid and struck their names from the May primary ballot.
Husted also upheld a challenge to the Libertarian’s candidate for attorney general, Stephen Linnabarry, removing him from the ballot.
The decision means the Libertarian Party of Ohio will not have any candidates appearing on the primary ballot in May, although write in candidates for auditor and secretary of state successfully qualified as write-in candidates.
More here.

# # #

CPAC, Phyllis Schlafly, and Immigration


Art credit: libertymusings.com

Katherine Connell at NRO’s The Corner reports alarming disagreement over GOP immigration and amnesty policy:
Two participants in a panel on immigration at CPAC today expressed confidence in their closing statements that Hispanic immigrants will be a source of future votes for the Republican party. “Latino voters are the Reagan Democrats of today,” said Alfonso Aguilar, the executive director of the Latino Partnership for Conservative Principles. “I believe that the majority of them can actually be members of CPAC in the future,” concurred the Reverend Luis Cortés Jr.

The panel was supposed to answer the question: “Can there be meaningful immigration reform without citizenship?”

Derrick Morgan, vice president of domestic policy at the Heritage Foundation, was the only one of four panelists to basically reject the premise of the question, saying that he wasn’t the best person to say whether legalization should include a path to citizenship since he didn’t think that Republicans should be pursuing a policy of comprehensive immigration reform at all right now: “I respectfully disagree with the policy of legalization with or without citizenship,” he said, instead favoring a piecemeal approach, beginning with enforcement. He noted that the current laws are not being enforced so “why would you trust this current administration” to implement a deal?

Aguilar vehemently disagreed: “Conservatives need to address immigration, and they need to do it now,” he said, adding that “our conservative base wants us to lead and legislate” on the issue. Alfonso said that in addition to immigrants doing the “jobs that Americans don’t want,” immigration “creates good-paying jobs for working-class Americans.”

Read the rest here.
Good timing: Here is Phyllis Schlafly warning that “Republicans are ‘fools’ to back ‘any kind of amnesty’.”  Katie McHugh at The Daily Caller reports: 
Eagle Forum president and conservative author Phyllis Schlafly condemned GOP leadership efforts to compromise with Democrats on immigration, telling her audience that Republicans are “fools” to back any kind of deal that includes citizenship for illegal immigrants.
“Republicans are fools to to support any kind of amnesty, or to import foreigners who will support big government and big spending,” she said during a blunt speech at The National Security Action in Washington, D.C. “Why is anyone surprised that three fourths of Hispanics and Asians voted for Obama during the 2012 election? … Sixty-nine percent of immigrants support Obamacare.”
Schlafly cited a battery of polls that drew stark contrasts between Americans and naturalized immigrants — which didn’t include recent legal or illegal immigrants. While 67 percent of native-born Americans cited the Constitution as a higher legal authority than international law, only one third of naturalized citizens believed the same, a Harris poll found.
Immigrants tend to vote Democratic not because they’re withdrawing their support from Republicans until the GOP works with Democrats on immigration reform, but because they benefit from generous social programs, she added. (RELATED: Oregon shifts 4,000 illegal immigrants into Obamacare)
“They’re not for amnesty,” she said. “They’re for the goody handouts of Democratic party… [A]mnesty is suicide for the conservative movement and the Republican party.”
Efforts to grant millions of illegal immigrants citizenship will dilute the pool of labor and drive down wages, hurting recent immigrants and Americans alike, Schlafly said.
“Bringing in more cheap labor is a direct attack on the people they’re amnestying and bringing in,” she said. “Amnesty is a complete betrayal of the people we let in the last few years.”
But Schlafly saved her most scathing remarks for Republican supporters of immigration reform: “Everything they’re saying is just a complete lie.”
Requiring illegals to repay back taxes is “the laugh of the day — a complete farce.”
“Of course the aliens will never learn English before they get amnesty,” while their background checks will be as thorough “as the Boston bombers,’” she added heatedly.
“The immigration bill is a disaster for unemployed, a disaster for people with low wages,” she said. “It’s a disaster that the people coming in will not vote the way we want them to vote, to cut overspending.”

# # #

Thursday, March 6, 2014

CTPP Monthly meeting Monday March 10 - 7:30pm



Cleveland Tea Party Patriots
Monthly meeting Monday March 10, 2014 at 7:30pm


Please join us for our monthly meeting Monday March 10, 2014 at 7:30pm.
This will be a very important meeting that will actually be a lead in for our monthly meeting in April in which our guest speaker will be Mr. Tom Kelly who will be speaking in regards to the Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District (NEORSD) rate increases and how you can help stop them.
In our upcoming meeting we will be discussing and showing how you can start to become an influence in your community, which will be an important first step not only in supporting the efforts of reigning in the abusive and unaccountable NEORSD.
Agenda:
  • Tea Party Patriots / National
  • 2014 Primary Races
  • Influencing Your Community
Please be mindful, the work, organizing and efforts of what we do now, is a direct relation to the results we see in November.  We cannot expect to stop the progressive creep and establishment GOP if people only want to be involved 2 weeks prior to the elections.  
While we deal with upcoming issues, we will continue to preach the mantra of "all politics are local" and how what we do this year all leads up to the 2016 Presidential race.
  • Date: Monday 3/10/14
  • Time: 7:30pm - 9:00pm
  • Location: Crowne Centre Building
  • Address: 5005 Rockside Rd Suite #960, Independence, OH  (Map)
NOTE: Enter through the Crowne Centre front or back entrance and take the elevators to the 9th floor.
We look forward to seeing you there! Feel free to bring a friend!